Heitjan D F, Asch D A, Ray Riju, Rukstalis Margaret, Patterson Freda, Lerman C
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021, USA.
Pharmacogenomics J. 2008 Dec;8(6):391-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500492. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a range of smoking cessation drug treatments, including varenicline, transdermal nicotine (TN), bupropion and the use of a genetic test to choose between TN and bupropion. We performed Monte Carlo simulation with sensitivity analysis, informing analyses with published estimates of model parameters and current prices for genetic testing and smoking-cessation therapy. The primary outcomes were discounted life-years (LY) and lifetime tobacco-cessation treatment costs. In the base case, varenicline treatment was optimal with an ICER, compared to bupropion, of $2985/LY saved. In sensitivity analyses, varenicline was in all cases (and bupropion in most cases) admissible; only under favorable assumptions was the genetically tailored approach competitive. Our data suggest that an untailored approach of treatment with either bupropion or varenicline is a cost-effective form of tobacco dependence treatment, but a tailored approach for selecting between TN and bupropion can be cost-effective under plausible assumptions.
我们评估了一系列戒烟药物治疗的成本效益,包括伐尼克兰、经皮尼古丁(TN)、安非他酮以及使用基因检测来在TN和安非他酮之间进行选择。我们进行了蒙特卡罗模拟和敏感性分析,利用已发表的模型参数估计值以及基因检测和戒烟治疗的当前价格为分析提供信息。主要结果是贴现生命年(LY)和终身戒烟治疗成本。在基础案例中,与安非他酮相比,伐尼克兰治疗是最优的,增量成本效果比为每挽救1个生命年节省2985美元。在敏感性分析中,伐尼克兰在所有情况下(安非他酮在大多数情况下)都是可接受的;只有在有利的假设下,基因定制方法才具有竞争力。我们的数据表明,使用安非他酮或伐尼克兰进行非定制治疗是一种具有成本效益的烟草依赖治疗形式,但在合理假设下,在TN和安非他酮之间进行选择的定制方法可能具有成本效益。