Amundsen Lotta K, Kokkonen Juha T, Sirén Heli
VTT, Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland.
J Sep Sci. 2008 Mar;31(5):803-13. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200700657.
Until now, partial filling micellar EKC-ESI-MS (PF-MEKC-ESI-MS) has seldom been applied for human biomolecules. In this study, determination of three electrically neutral endogenous steroid hormones, namely androstenedione, testosterone, and epitestosterone, by PF-MEKC-ESI-MS was investigated. Since ESI-MS and ESI-MS/MS behaviors of testosterone and epitestosterone proved to be nearly identical, efficient separation of the two compounds was required to obtain reliable identification. The chemical conditions as well as the instrumental parameters affecting the PF-MEKC-ESI-MS analysis were researched. In optimal conditions, ESI-MS showed excellent selectivity, and all the steroids could be identified using SIM. LODs were 0.75-5 microg/mL. The results obtained by PF-MEKC-ESI-MS were compared with those obtained by corresponding PF-MEKC-UV. PF-MEKC-UV provided better resolution, repeatability, and more than ten-fold higher sensitivity, in terms of LODs, than PF-MEKC-ESI-MS. The reasons for this were carefully examined. In comparison with PF-MEKC-UV, PF-MEKC-ESI-MS suffered from greater band broadening owing to the sheath-liquid interface. Resolution was also decreased owing to the elevated capillary temperature. Finally, we discovered that in the analysis of electrically neutral compounds, in-capillary sample concentration by micellar sweeping could be more efficiently utilized in PF-MEKC-UV than in PF-MEKC-ESI-MS.
到目前为止,部分填充胶束电动色谱-电喷雾电离质谱法(PF-MEKC-ESI-MS)很少应用于人体生物分子分析。在本研究中,考察了用PF-MEKC-ESI-MS测定三种电中性内源性甾体激素,即雄烯二酮、睾酮和表睾酮。由于睾酮和表睾酮的ESI-MS及ESI-MS/MS行为几乎相同,因此需要对这两种化合物进行有效分离才能获得可靠的鉴定结果。研究了影响PF-MEKC-ESI-MS分析的化学条件及仪器参数。在最佳条件下,ESI-MS显示出优异的选择性,所有甾体均可采用选择离子监测(SIM)模式进行鉴定。检测限为0.75 - 5μg/mL。将PF-MEKC-ESI-MS得到的结果与相应的PF-MEKC-UV得到的结果进行了比较。就检测限而言,PF-MEKC-UV提供了更好的分离度、重复性,且灵敏度比PF-MEKC-ESI-MS高十多倍。仔细研究了造成这种情况的原因。与PF-MEKC-UV相比,PF-MEKC-ESI-MS由于鞘液界面导致谱带展宽更严重。由于毛细管温度升高,分离度也有所降低。最后,我们发现,在分析电中性化合物时,与PF-MEKC-ESI-MS相比,胶束扫集进样在PF-MEKC-UV中能更有效地利用毛细管内样品富集。