• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

童年双语经历对情景记忆和语义记忆任务的影响。

The effect of childhood bilingualism on episodic and semantic memory tasks.

作者信息

Kormi-Nouri Reza, Shojaei Razie-Sadat, Moniri Sadegheh, Gholami Ali-Reza, Moradi Ali-Reza, Akbari-Zardkhaneh Saeed, Nilsson Lars-Göran

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Orebro University, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Psychol. 2008 Apr;49(2):93-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00633.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00633.x
PMID:18352979
Abstract

Kormi-Nouri, Moniri and Nilsson (2003) demonstrated that Swedish-Persian bilingual children recalled at a higher level than Swedish monolingual children, when they were tested using Swedish materials. The present study was designed to examine the bilingual advantage of children who use different languages in their everyday life but have the same cultural background and live in their communities in the same way as monolingual children. In four experiments, 488 monolingual and bilingual children were compared with regard to episodic and semantic memory tasks. In experiments 1 and 2 there were 144 boys and 144 girls in three school groups (aged 9-10 years, 13-14 years and 16-17 years) and in three language groups (Persian monolingual, Turkish-Persian bilingual, and Kurdish-Persian bilingual). In experiments 3 and 4, there were 200 male students in two school groups (aged 9-10 years and 16-17 years) and in two language groups (Persian monolingual and Turkish-Persian bilingual). In the episodic memory task, children learned sentences (experiments 1-3) and words (Experiment 4). Letter and category fluency tests were used as measures of semantic memory. To change cognitive demands in memory tasks, in Experiment 1, the integration of nouns and verbs within sentences was manipulated by the level of association between verb and noun in each sentence. At retrieval, a recognition test was used. In experiments 2 and 3, the organization between sentences was manipulated at encoding in Experiment 2 and at both encoding and retrieval in Experiment 3 through the use of categories among the objects. At retrieval, free recall or cued recall tests were employed. In Experiment 4, the bilingual children were tested with regard to both their first and their second language. In all four experiments, a positive effect of bilingualism was found on episodic and semantic memory tasks; the effect was more pronounced for older than younger children. The bilingual advantage was not affected by changing cognitive demands or by using first/second language in memory tasks. The present findings support the cross-language interactivity hypothesis of bilingual advantage.

摘要

科尔米-努里、莫妮里和尼尔森(2003年)证明,当使用瑞典语材料对瑞典-波斯双语儿童和瑞典单语儿童进行测试时,前者的回忆水平更高。本研究旨在考察那些在日常生活中使用不同语言,但拥有相同文化背景且与单语儿童以相同方式生活在其社区中的儿童的双语优势。在四项实验中,对488名单语和双语儿童在情景记忆和语义记忆任务方面进行了比较。在实验1和2中,三个学校组(9至10岁、13至14岁和16至17岁)以及三个语言组(波斯语单语、土耳其-波斯双语和库尔德-波斯双语)中各有144名男孩和144名女孩。在实验3和4中,两个学校组(9至10岁和16至17岁)以及两个语言组(波斯语单语和土耳其-波斯双语)中有200名男学生。在情景记忆任务中,儿童学习句子(实验1至3)和单词(实验4)。字母流畅性测试和类别流畅性测试被用作语义记忆的测量方法。为了改变记忆任务中的认知需求,在实验1中,通过每个句子中动词和名词之间的关联程度来操纵句子中名词和动词的整合。在检索时,使用了识别测试。在实验2和3中,通过在实验2的编码阶段以及实验3的编码和检索阶段使用对象之间的类别来操纵句子之间的组织。在检索时,采用自由回忆或线索回忆测试。在实验4中,对双语儿童的第一语言和第二语言都进行了测试。在所有四项实验中,发现双语对情景记忆和语义记忆任务有积极影响;这种影响在年龄较大的儿童中比年龄较小的儿童中更为明显。双语优势不受改变认知需求或在记忆任务中使用第一/第二语言的影响。本研究结果支持双语优势的跨语言交互性假说。

相似文献

1
The effect of childhood bilingualism on episodic and semantic memory tasks.童年双语经历对情景记忆和语义记忆任务的影响。
Scand J Psychol. 2008 Apr;49(2):93-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00633.x.
2
Episodic and semantic memory in bilingual and monolingual children.双语和单语儿童的情景记忆和语义记忆
Scand J Psychol. 2003 Feb;44(1):47-54. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00320.
3
Conceptual versus monolingual scoring: when does it make a difference?概念性评分与单语评分:何时会产生差异?
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2005 Jul;36(3):188-200.
4
Comparison of verbal fluency in monolingual and bilingual elderly in Iran.伊朗单语和双语老年人语言流畅性的比较。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2021 Jan-Feb;28(1):80-87. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1594234. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
5
The effects of noise and gender on children's episodic and semantic memory.噪音和性别对儿童情景记忆和语义记忆的影响。
Scand J Psychol. 2004 Nov;45(5):407-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00422.x.
6
Phonotactic probability effect in nonword recall and its relationship with vocabulary in monolingual and bilingual preschoolers.非词回忆中的语音规则概率效应及其与单语和双语学龄前儿童词汇量的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Apr;105(4):306-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
7
Language-specific knowledge and short-term memory in bilingual and non-bilingual children.双语和非双语儿童的特定语言知识与短期记忆
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1999 May;52(2):303-24. doi: 10.1080/713755823.
8
What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage.西蒙说了什么?重温双语优势。
Dev Sci. 2007 Nov;10(6):719-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00623.x.
9
Verbal working memory in bilingual children.双语儿童的言语工作记忆。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Aug;47(4):863-76. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/064).
10
To what extent does bilingualism affect children's performance on the NEPSY?
Child Neuropsychol. 2008 Jan;14(1):71-81. doi: 10.1080/09297040701218405.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of bilingualism on autobiographical memory: variation in idea density and retrieval speed.双语对自传体记忆的影响:想法密度和检索速度的变化。
Memory. 2023 Apr;31(4):491-501. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2171435. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
2
Preliminary Reliability and Validity of the Iranian Computerized Version of Memory Tasks of the Betula Study.伊朗版计算机化桦树研究记忆任务的初步信度和效度
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2020 Jul-Aug;11(4):535-548. doi: 10.32598/bcn.9.10.105. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
3
The Role of Moderating Variables on BOLD fMRI Response During Semantic Verbal Fluency and Finger Tapping in Active and Educated Healthy Seniors.
调节变量在活跃且受过教育的健康老年人进行语义言语流畅性和手指敲击任务时对血氧水平依赖性功能磁共振成像反应中的作用
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jun 5;14:203. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00203. eCollection 2020.
4
Evaluation of Central Auditory Processing of Azeri-Persian Bilinguals Using Dichotic Listening Tasks in First and Second Languages.使用第一语言和第二语言的双耳分听任务对阿塞拜疆-波斯语双语者的中枢听觉处理进行评估。
Iran J Child Neurol. 2019 Winter;13(1):79-90.
5
Does bilingualism protect against cognitive aging?: Methodological issues in research on bilingualism, cognitive reserve, and dementia incidence.双语能力能否预防认知衰老?:关于双语能力、认知储备和痴呆症发病率研究中的方法学问题。
Linguist Approaches Biling. 2016 Jan;6(5):590-604. doi: 10.1075/lab.15043.wat. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
6
Differential relationships between language skills and working memory in Turkish-Dutch and native-Dutch first-graders from low-income families.来自低收入家庭的土耳其裔荷兰和荷兰本土一年级学生语言技能与工作记忆之间的差异关系。
Read Writ. 2017;30(9):1945-1964. doi: 10.1007/s11145-017-9760-2. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
7
How bilingualism protects the brain from aging: Insights from bimodal bilinguals.双语如何保护大脑免受衰老影响:来自双峰双语者的见解。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Aug;38(8):4109-4124. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23652. Epub 2017 May 17.
8
Hey Teacher, Don't Leave Them Kids Alone: Action Is Better for Memory than Reading.嘿,老师,别让孩子们独自待着:行动对记忆的作用比阅读更大。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 9;8:325. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00325. eCollection 2017.
9
How Does the Linguistic Distance Between Spoken and Standard Language in Arabic Affect Recall and Recognition Performances During Verbal Memory Examination.阿拉伯语口语与标准语之间的语言距离如何影响言语记忆测试中的回忆和识别表现。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Jun;46(3):551-566. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9453-z.
10
Novel word retention in bilingual and monolingual speakers.双语和单语说话者的新词保持。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 29;5:1024. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01024. eCollection 2014.