Suppr超能文献

病原体灭活:一种预防原则范式。

Pathogen reduction: a precautionary principle paradigm.

作者信息

Alter Harvey J

机构信息

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

出版信息

Transfus Med Rev. 2008 Apr;22(2):97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2008.01.001.

Abstract

Although remarkable advances have been made in the prevention of the major transfusion-transmitted diseases, long intervals have transpired between the first recognition of transfusion risk and the implementation of a preventive strategy. For hepatitis B virus, that interval was 30 years; for non-A, non-B/hepatitis C virus, 15 years; and for human immunodeficiency virus, West Nile virus, Trypanosoma cruzi, and bacteria, 3, 4, 5, and 18 years, respectively. In our existing reactive approach, there is a fundamental and inevitable delay before we can react; and thus, infections are destined to occur. The continued emergence or reemergence of transfusion-transmitted infections calls for a new paradigm of preemptive pathogen reduction (PR). Two PR systems, psoralen/UV-A and riboflavin/UV-A, have shown efficacy and safety for platelets and plasma; and psoralen/UV-A technology has been successfully implemented for platelets in Europe. Pathogen reduction can eliminate or reduce the risk for any nucleic acid containing agent, including bacteria, and thus will be effective for all but prion diseases. It is possible to introduce PR for platelets and plasma now and to concentrate resources on developing PR for red cells. This will require an intellectual and financial commitment from the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration, industry, and the blood bank establishment, just as occurred for nucleic acid testing (NAT) technology. This can be done if there is sufficient will to do it.

摘要

尽管在预防主要的输血传播疾病方面已取得显著进展,但从首次认识到输血风险到实施预防策略之间仍间隔了很长时间。对于乙型肝炎病毒,这一间隔为30年;对于非甲非乙型/丙型肝炎病毒,为15年;而对于人类免疫缺陷病毒、西尼罗河病毒、克氏锥虫和细菌,分别为3年、4年、5年和18年。在我们现有的应对方法中,在我们能够做出反应之前存在根本性且不可避免的延迟;因此,感染注定会发生。输血传播感染的持续出现或再次出现需要一种新的预防性病原体灭活(PR)模式。两种PR系统,补骨脂素/紫外线A和核黄素/紫外线A,已在血小板和血浆方面显示出有效性和安全性;并且补骨脂素/紫外线A技术已在欧洲成功应用于血小板。病原体灭活可以消除或降低任何含核酸病原体的风险,包括细菌,因此除朊病毒疾病外对所有疾病均有效。现在有可能对血小板和血浆引入PR,并将资源集中用于开发红细胞的PR。这将需要美国国立卫生研究院、食品药品监督管理局、行业以及血库机构在智力和资金上的投入,就如同核酸检测(NAT)技术那样。如果有足够的意愿去做,这是可以实现的。

相似文献

1
Pathogen reduction: a precautionary principle paradigm.病原体灭活:一种预防原则范式。
Transfus Med Rev. 2008 Apr;22(2):97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2008.01.001.
2
Emerging pathogens in transfusion medicine.输血医学中的新兴病原体。
Clin Lab Med. 2010 Jun;30(2):499-509. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 May 6.
3
Emerging infectious diseases that threaten the blood supply.威胁血液供应的新发传染病。
Semin Hematol. 2007 Jan;44(1):32-41. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2006.09.016.
5
[Ten years of nucleic acid testing: lessons and prospects].[十年核酸检测:经验与展望]
Transfus Clin Biol. 2011 Apr;18(2):133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2011.01.007. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
6
Emerging infections in transfusion medicine.输血医学中的新发感染
Clin Lab Med. 2004 Sep;24(3):797-823, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2004.05.009.

引用本文的文献

5
Transfusion medicine: Overtime paradigm changes and emerging paradoxes.输血医学:超时范式转变与新兴悖论。
Transfus Clin Biol. 2020 Nov;27(4):262-267. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
7
Contemporary resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock: What will the future hold?当代失血性休克复苏:未来将会怎样?
Am J Surg. 2020 Sep;220(3):580-588. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 May 11.

本文引用的文献

2
Managing threats rather than risks in blood transfusion: robust design for a complex system.
Transfusion. 2006 Nov;46(11):2011-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.01010.x.
3
Transmission of human herpesvirus 8 by blood transfusion.通过输血传播人类疱疹病毒8型。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 28;355(13):1331-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055009.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验