Duval Xavier, Leport Catherine
APHP, Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Paris 7 Diderot University, Paris, France.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2008 Apr;8(4):225-32. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70064-1.
Infective endocarditis is a severe disease with high mortality, and results most often from the combination of bacteraemia (sometimes provoked) and a predisposing cardiac condition. Prophylaxis for infective endocarditis has been recommended by different countries on the basis of the supposed pathophysiology of the disease, although no randomised clinical trial has confirmed its efficacy. We review the data presented over the past few decades, challenge the principles underlying prophylaxis recommendations, and analyse the arguments that explain the general tendency in very recent years to decrease prophylaxis indications. Such arguments include the probable important role of everyday-life bacteraemia in the occurrence of infective endocarditis, the estimated huge number of prophylaxis doses to be given to avoid a single case of infective endocarditis, and the lack of scientific evidence to identify those procedures that should lead to prophylaxis. Recommendations for prophylaxis are now essentially focused on patients with high-risk predisposing cardiac conditions before dental procedures.
感染性心内膜炎是一种死亡率很高的严重疾病,多数由菌血症(有时是激发性的)和易患心脏疾病共同作用所致。尽管尚无随机临床试验证实其疗效,但不同国家已根据该病假定的病理生理学推荐了感染性心内膜炎的预防措施。我们回顾了过去几十年所呈现的数据,对预防措施推荐所依据的原则提出质疑,并分析了近年来预防指征普遍减少这一趋势的相关论据。这些论据包括日常生活中的菌血症在感染性心内膜炎发生中可能起的重要作用、为避免一例感染性心内膜炎估计要给予的大量预防剂量,以及缺乏科学证据来确定哪些操作应进行预防。现在预防措施的推荐主要集中于牙科操作前具有高风险易患心脏疾病的患者。