Suppr超能文献

爱尔兰共和国艰难梭菌相关性疾病的实验室诊断:爱尔兰微生物实验室调查

Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in the Republic of Ireland: a survey of Irish microbiology laboratories.

作者信息

Fitzpatrick F, Oza A, Gilleece A, O'Byrne A M, Drudy D

机构信息

Health Protection Surveillance Centre, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2008 Apr;68(4):315-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.01.025. Epub 2008 Mar 19.

Abstract

The Health Protection Surveillance Centre (HPSC) established a group to produce national guidelines for Clostridium difficile in Ireland in 2006. A laboratory questionnaire was distributed to determine current C. difficile diagnostic practices. Twenty-nine out of 44 laboratories providing C. difficile diagnostic services to 34 hospitals responded. Twenty-five out of 29 (86%) laboratories processed specimens for C. difficile and four (13.8%) forwarded specimens to another laboratory. Sixteen laboratories (64%) processed specimens for other healthcare facilities. None routinely examined stool for C. difficile, seven (28%) examined specimens only when requested to do so and 18 (72%) used specific selection criteria, including testing all liquid stools (39%), all nosocomial diarrhoea (44%), specific clinical criteria (28%) and history of antibiotic therapy (22%). All tested stool directly for C. difficile toxin with a variety of enzyme immunoassays, with 24 (96%) detecting both toxin A and B and one detecting toxin A only. Three (12%) laboratories used cytotoxicity assays; none used polymerase chain reaction and six (24%) laboratories performed C. difficile culture but only under specific circumstances. Seven (28%) laboratories had isolates typed during outbreaks, but none had the facilities to do so on-site. The HPSC group will produce national recommendations for laboratory diagnosis, surveillance and management of C. difficile infection. Since there are marked differences in diagnostic practices throughout the country and no national reference laboratory, the implementation of these recommendations will have cost implications that will need to be addressed.

摘要

2006年,健康保护监测中心(HPSC)成立了一个小组,负责制定爱尔兰艰难梭菌感染的国家指南。发放了一份实验室调查问卷,以确定当前艰难梭菌的诊断方法。向为34家医院提供艰难梭菌诊断服务的44家实验室中的29家进行了调查,这29家实验室作出了回应。29家实验室中有25家(86%)对艰难梭菌标本进行检测,4家(13.8%)将标本转送至其他实验室。16家实验室(64%)为其他医疗机构检测标本。没有实验室常规检测粪便中的艰难梭菌,7家(28%)仅在接到要求时才检测标本,18家(72%)采用特定的选择标准,包括检测所有稀便(39%)、所有医院内腹泻(44%)、特定临床标准(28%)和抗生素治疗史(22%)。所有实验室均直接采用各种酶免疫测定法检测粪便中的艰难梭菌毒素,24家(96%)检测到毒素A和毒素B,1家仅检测到毒素A。3家(12%)实验室采用细胞毒性试验;没有实验室使用聚合酶链反应,6家(24%)实验室进行艰难梭菌培养,但仅在特定情况下进行。7家(28%)实验室在疫情暴发期间对分离株进行分型,但没有实验室具备现场分型的能力。HPSC小组将制定艰难梭菌感染实验室诊断、监测和管理的国家建议。由于全国各地的诊断方法存在显著差异,且没有国家参考实验室,这些建议的实施将产生成本问题,需要加以解决。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验