Yamaguchi Satoko, Wolf Reinhard, Desplan Claude, Heisenberg Martin
Department of Genetics and Neurobiology, Biozentrum, University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 25;105(12):4910-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711484105. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
Whether motion vision uses color contrast is a controversial issue that has been investigated in several species, from insects to humans. We used Drosophila to answer this question, monitoring the optomotor response to moving color stimuli in WT and genetic variants. In the fly eye, a motion channel (outer photoreceptors R1-R6) and a color channel (inner photoreceptors R7 and R8) have been distinguished. With moving bars of alternating colors and high color contrast, a brightness ratio of the two colors can be found, at which the optomotor response is largely missing (point of equiluminance). Under these conditions, mutant flies lacking functional rhodopsin in R1-R6 cells do not respond at all. Furthermore, genetically eliminating the function of photoreceptors R7 and R8 neither alters the strength of the optomotor response nor shifts the point of equiluminance. We conclude that the color channel (R7/R8) does not contribute to motion detection as monitored by the optomotor response.
运动视觉是否利用颜色对比度是一个有争议的问题,已经在从昆虫到人类的多个物种中进行了研究。我们利用果蝇来回答这个问题,监测野生型和基因变体对移动颜色刺激的视动反应。在果蝇眼中,已经区分出一个运动通道(外部光感受器R1-R6)和一个颜色通道(内部光感受器R7和R8)。对于交替颜色且颜色对比度高的移动条纹,可以找到两种颜色的亮度比,在这个亮度比下视动反应基本消失(等亮度点)。在这些条件下,R1-R6细胞中缺乏功能性视紫红质的突变果蝇根本没有反应。此外,通过基因手段消除光感受器R7和R8的功能,既不会改变视动反应的强度,也不会改变等亮度点。我们得出结论,颜色通道(R7/R8)对视动反应所监测的运动检测没有贡献。