• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对干预反应较低的学生,阅读干预中不同时长的反应情况。

Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students with low response to intervention.

作者信息

Wanzek Jeanne, Vaughn Sharon

机构信息

Florida State University, USA.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 2008 Mar-Apr;41(2):126-42. doi: 10.1177/0022219407313426.

DOI:10.1177/0022219407313426
PMID:18354933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3322477/
Abstract

Two studies examined response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for two cohorts of first-grade students demonstrating low levels of reading after previous intervention. Students were assigned to one of three groups that received (a) a single dose of intervention, (b) a double dose of intervention, or (c) no intervention. Examination of individual student response to intervention indicated that more students in the treatment groups demonstrated accelerated learning over time than students in the comparison condition. Students' responses to the single-dose and double-dose interventions were similar over time. Students in all conditions demonstrated particular difficulties with gains in reading fluency. Implications for future research and practice within response to intervention models are provided.

摘要

两项研究考察了针对两组在先前干预后阅读水平较低的一年级学生,不同时长阅读干预的效果。学生被分配到三个组之一,分别接受(a)单次干预剂量、(b)双次干预剂量或(c)无干预。对个体学生干预反应的考察表明,随着时间推移,治疗组中比对照组有更多学生表现出加速学习。随着时间推移,学生对单次剂量和双次剂量干预的反应相似。所有条件下的学生在阅读流畅性提高方面都表现出特别的困难。文中还提供了对干预反应模型未来研究和实践的启示。

相似文献

1
Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students with low response to intervention.针对干预反应较低的学生,阅读干预中不同时长的反应情况。
J Learn Disabil. 2008 Mar-Apr;41(2):126-42. doi: 10.1177/0022219407313426.
2
Effectiveness of Spanish intervention for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading difficulties.针对有阅读困难风险的一年级英语学习者的西班牙语干预措施的有效性。
J Learn Disabil. 2006 Jan-Feb;39(1):56-73. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390010601.
3
Computer-assisted instruction to prevent early reading difficulties in students at risk for dyslexia: Outcomes from two instructional approaches.计算机辅助教学预防阅读困难:两种教学方法的效果
Ann Dyslexia. 2010 Jun;60(1):40-56. doi: 10.1007/s11881-009-0032-y. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
4
Response to intervention with secondary school students with reading difficulties.中学阅读困难学生的干预反应。
J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):244-56. doi: 10.1177/0022219412442157. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
5
Technology-assisted reading fluency interventions for students with reading difficulties: evidence from a meta-analytic approach of single case design studies.技术辅助阅读流畅性干预对阅读困难学生的效果:来自单一被试设计研究荟萃分析的证据。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Nov;18(8):1544-1554. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2060351. Epub 2022 May 18.
6
Effects of small-group reading instruction and curriculum differences for students most at risk in kindergartenL: two-year results for secondary- and tertiary-level interventions.针对幼儿园中风险最高的学生的小组阅读教学和课程差异的影响:中学和高等教育阶段干预措施的两年结果。
J Learn Disabil. 2008 Mar-Apr;41(2):101-14. doi: 10.1177/0022219407313412.
7
Improving English reading fluency and comprehension for children with reading fluency disabilities.提高阅读流畅性障碍儿童的英语阅读流畅性和理解能力。
Dyslexia. 2022 Feb;28(1):79-96. doi: 10.1002/dys.1695. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
8
Effects of intensive reading intervention for eighth-grade students with persistently inadequate response to intervention.强化阅读干预对八年级学生持续干预反应不足的影响。
J Learn Disabil. 2012 Nov-Dec;45(6):515-25. doi: 10.1177/0022219411402692. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
9
Teaching children with dyslexia to spell in a reading-writers' workshop.在读写工作坊中教诵读困难的孩子拼写。
Ann Dyslexia. 2013 Apr;63(1):1-24. doi: 10.1007/s11881-011-0054-0. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
10
Effects of Varying Levels of Data Use to Intensify a Multisyllabic Word Reading Intervention for Upper Elementary Students With or at Risk for Reading Disabilities.不同数据使用程度对强化小学高年段阅读障碍学生或有阅读障碍风险学生多音节词阅读干预的效果。
J Learn Disabil. 2022 Sep-Oct;55(5):393-407. doi: 10.1177/00222194211048405. Epub 2021 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeted school-based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with or at risk of academic difficulties in Grades K-6: A systematic review.针对K-6年级有学习困难或有学习困难风险的学生提高阅读和数学能力的校本干预措施:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 6;17(2):e1152. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1152. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
A meta-analysis of the effects of foundational skills and multicomponent reading interventions on reading comprehension for primary-grade students.基础技能和多成分阅读干预对小学低年级学生阅读理解影响的荟萃分析。
Learn Individ Differ. 2022 Jan;93. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102062. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective? An experimental and longitudinal study.对于哪些幼儿而言,最佳阅读方法是无效的?一项实验性纵向研究。
J Learn Disabil. 2006 Sep-Oct;39(5):414-31. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390050401.
2
Reading research for students with LD: a meta-analysis of intervention outcomes.针对学习障碍学生的阅读研究:干预结果的元分析
J Learn Disabil. 1999 Nov-Dec;32(6):504-32. doi: 10.1177/002221949903200605.
3
Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches.
A meta-analysis of single-subject reading intervention studies for struggling readers: using Improvement Rate Difference (IRD).
针对阅读困难者的单受试者阅读干预研究的荟萃分析:使用改善率差异(IRD)
Heliyon. 2020 Nov 3;6(11):e05024. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05024. eCollection 2020 Nov.
4
Is "Response/No Response" Too Simple a Notion for RTI Frameworks? Exploring Multiple Response Types With Latent Profile Analysis.RTI 框架中的“反应/无反应”概念是否过于简单?利用潜在剖面分析探索多种反应类型。
J Learn Disabil. 2020 Nov/Dec;53(6):454-468. doi: 10.1177/0022219420931818. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
5
Examining How Treatment Fidelity Is Supported, Measured, and Reported in K-3 Reading Intervention Research.审视小学低年级阅读干预研究中治疗保真度是如何得到支持、测量和报告的。
Educ Psychol Rev. 2018 Sep;30(3):885-919. doi: 10.1007/s10648-017-9429-z. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
6
Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Tier 2 Type Reading Interventions in Grades K-3.幼儿园至三年级二级阅读干预效果的荟萃分析
Educ Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;28(3):551-576. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7. Epub 2015 Jun 28.
7
To Wait in Tier 1 or Intervene Immediately: A Randomized Experiment Examining First Grade Response to Intervention (RTI) in Reading.是等待一级干预还是立即介入:一项检验一年级阅读干预反应(RTI)的随机实验。
Except Child. 2014 Oct 1;81(1):11-27. doi: 10.1177/0014402914532234.
8
Accelerating chronically unresponsive children to tier 3 instruction: what level of data is necessary to ensure selection accuracy?加速慢性无反应儿童接受第三级指导:需要什么级别的数据才能确保选择的准确性?
J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):204-16. doi: 10.1177/0022219412442151. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
9
An Experimental Study of Scheduling and Duration of "Tier 2" First-Grade Reading Intervention.一年级“二级”阅读干预的时间安排与时长的实验研究
J Res Educ Eff. 2011 Jan 1;4(3):208-230. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2010.530127.
10
Effects of intensive reading intervention for eighth-grade students with persistently inadequate response to intervention.强化阅读干预对八年级学生持续干预反应不足的影响。
J Learn Disabil. 2012 Nov-Dec;45(6):515-25. doi: 10.1177/0022219411402692. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
针对重度阅读障碍儿童的强化补救教学:两种教学方法的即时和长期效果
J Learn Disabil. 2001 Jan-Feb;34(1):33-58, 78. doi: 10.1177/002221940103400104.
4
Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: a double-deficit perspective.
J Learn Disabil. 2000 Jul-Aug;33(4):334-58. doi: 10.1177/002221940003300406.
5
Training phonological awareness with and without explicit attention to articulation.在明确关注发音和不明确关注发音的情况下训练语音意识。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 Apr;72(4):271-304. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2490.