Lippa Katherine D, Klein Helen Altman, Shalin Valerie L
Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Hwy., Dayton, OH 45435-0001, USA.
Hum Factors. 2008 Feb;50(1):112-20. doi: 10.1518/001872008X250601.
To assess the relationship between decision making and successful diabetes self-management.
Patients with type II diabetes make routine but critical self-management decisions.
We conducted cognitive task analysis interviews with 18 patients to examine problem detection, functional relationships, problem-solving strategies, and types of knowledge used to make self-management decisions. We expected that these decision processes would be related to behavioral adherence and glycemic control.
Verbal reports displaying problem detection skills, knowledge of functional relationships, and effective problem-solving strategies were all related to better adherence. Problem detection skill was linked to greater glycemic control. Participants differed in declarative and applied knowledge.
Diabetes self-management draws on the same cognitive skills found in experts from diverse professional domains. Considering diabetes self-management as a form of expertise may support adherence.
Human factors approaches that support professional expertise may be useful for the decision making of patients with diabetes and other chronic diseases.
评估决策与成功的糖尿病自我管理之间的关系。
II型糖尿病患者要做出常规但关键的自我管理决策。
我们对18名患者进行了认知任务分析访谈,以检查问题检测、功能关系、解决问题的策略以及用于做出自我管理决策的知识类型。我们预期这些决策过程将与行为依从性和血糖控制相关。
显示出问题检测技能、功能关系知识和有效解决问题策略的口头报告均与更好的依从性相关。问题检测技能与更好的血糖控制相关。参与者在陈述性知识和应用知识方面存在差异。
糖尿病自我管理运用了不同专业领域专家所具备的相同认知技能。将糖尿病自我管理视为一种专业技能形式可能有助于提高依从性。
支持专业技能的人因学方法可能对糖尿病及其他慢性病患者的决策有用。