Suppr超能文献

糖尿病预防计划中糖尿病风险的性别差异及强化生活方式干预的效果

Sex differences in diabetes risk and the effect of intensive lifestyle modification in the Diabetes Prevention Program.

作者信息

Perreault Leigh, Ma Yong, Dagogo-Jack Sam, Horton Edward, Marrero David, Crandall Jill, Barrett-Connor Elizabeth

机构信息

University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2008 Jul;31(7):1416-21. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2390. Epub 2008 Mar 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In participants of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) randomized to intensive lifestyle modification (ILS), meeting ILS goals strongly correlated with prevention of diabetes in the group as a whole. Men met significantly more ILS goals than women but had a similar incidence of diabetes. Therefore, we explored sex differences in risk factors for diabetes and the effect of ILS on risk factors.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Baseline risk factors for diabetes and percent change in risk factors over the first year in men versus women were compared using Wilcoxon's rank-sum tests.

RESULTS

At baseline, men were older and had a larger waist circumference; higher fasting plasma glucose concentration, caloric intake, and blood pressure; and lower HDL cholesterol and corrected insulin response than women, who were less physically active and had a higher BMI (P < 0.01 for all comparisons). Over the first year of the DPP, no sex difference in risk factors for diabetes was observed for those who lost <3% body weight. Weight loss of 3-7% body weight yielded greater decreases in 2-h glucose (P < 0.01), insulin concentration (P < 0.04), and insulin resistance (P < 0.03) in men than in women. Weight loss of >7% body weight resulted in greater decreases in 2-h glucose (P < 0.01), triglyceride level (P < 0.01), and A1C (P < 0.03) in men than in women.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight loss >3% body weight yielded greater reduction in risk factors for diabetes in men than in women. Despite the more favorable effects of ILS in men, baseline risk factors were more numerous in men and likely obscured any sex difference in incident diabetes.

摘要

目的

在糖尿病预防计划(DPP)中,随机分配至强化生活方式干预(ILS)组的参与者,实现ILS目标与整个组预防糖尿病密切相关。男性实现的ILS目标显著多于女性,但糖尿病发病率相似。因此,我们探讨了糖尿病危险因素的性别差异以及ILS对危险因素的影响。

研究设计与方法

使用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较男性与女性糖尿病的基线危险因素以及第一年危险因素的百分比变化。

结果

在基线时,男性年龄更大,腰围更大;空腹血糖浓度、热量摄入和血压更高;高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和校正胰岛素反应低于女性,而女性身体活动较少且体重指数较高(所有比较P<0.01)。在DPP的第一年,体重减轻<3%的人群中未观察到糖尿病危险因素的性别差异。体重减轻3-7%时,男性2小时血糖(P<0.01)、胰岛素浓度(P<0.04)和胰岛素抵抗(P<0.03)的下降幅度大于女性。体重减轻>7%时,男性2小时血糖(P<0.01)、甘油三酯水平(P<0.01)和糖化血红蛋白(P<0.03)的下降幅度大于女性。

结论

体重减轻>3%时,男性糖尿病危险因素的降低幅度大于女性。尽管ILS对男性的影响更有利,但男性的基线危险因素更多,可能掩盖了糖尿病发病方面的任何性别差异。

相似文献

8
Alcohol consumption and diabetes risk in the Diabetes Prevention Program.糖尿病预防计划中的饮酒与糖尿病风险
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Sep;90(3):595-601. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27382. Epub 2009 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

2
Using Metabolic Testing to Personalize Behavioral Obesity Treatment.利用代谢测试实现行为性肥胖治疗的个性化。
Obes Sci Pract. 2025 Mar 11;11(2):e70065. doi: 10.1002/osp4.70065. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality trends in men and women with diabetes, 1971 to 2000.1971年至2000年糖尿病男性和女性的死亡率趋势。
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Aug 7;147(3):149-55. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-3-200708070-00167. Epub 2007 Jun 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验