• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sex differences in diabetes risk and the effect of intensive lifestyle modification in the Diabetes Prevention Program.糖尿病预防计划中糖尿病风险的性别差异及强化生活方式干预的效果
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jul;31(7):1416-21. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2390. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
2
Body size and shape changes and the risk of diabetes in the diabetes prevention program.糖尿病预防计划中的体型和形状变化与糖尿病风险
Diabetes. 2007 Jun;56(6):1680-5. doi: 10.2337/db07-0009. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
3
The association of elective hormone therapy with changes in lipids among glucose intolerant postmenopausal women in the diabetes prevention program.择期激素治疗与糖尿病预防计划中葡萄糖耐量减退的绝经后妇女血脂变化的关系。
Metabolism. 2013 Sep;62(9):1313-22. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 May 6.
4
The rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of PREVENT-DM: A community-based comparative effectiveness trial of lifestyle intervention and metformin among Latinas with prediabetes.PREVENT-DM的基本原理、设计及基线特征:一项针对患有糖尿病前期的拉丁裔女性进行的生活方式干预与二甲双胍的社区比较疗效试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt B):320-327. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
5
Regression from pre-diabetes to normal glucose regulation in the diabetes prevention program.糖尿病预防计划中从糖尿病前期回归至正常血糖调节状态
Diabetes Care. 2009 Sep;32(9):1583-8. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0523. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
6
Effect of progression from impaired glucose tolerance to diabetes on cardiovascular risk factors and its amelioration by lifestyle and metformin intervention: the Diabetes Prevention Program randomized trial by the Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group.从糖耐量受损进展为糖尿病对心血管危险因素的影响以及生活方式和二甲双胍干预对其的改善作用:糖尿病预防计划研究组的糖尿病预防计划随机试验
Diabetes Care. 2009 Apr;32(4):726-32. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0494. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
7
Metabolic syndrome components and their response to lifestyle and metformin interventions are associated with differences in diabetes risk in persons with impaired glucose tolerance.代谢综合征成分及其对生活方式和二甲双胍干预的反应与葡萄糖耐量受损者的糖尿病风险差异有关。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Apr;16(4):326-33. doi: 10.1111/dom.12220. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
8
Alcohol consumption and diabetes risk in the Diabetes Prevention Program.糖尿病预防计划中的饮酒与糖尿病风险
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Sep;90(3):595-601. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27382. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
9
Impact of intensive lifestyle and metformin therapy on cardiovascular disease risk factors in the diabetes prevention program.强化生活方式和二甲双胍治疗对糖尿病预防计划中心血管疾病危险因素的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2005 Apr;28(4):888-94. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.4.888.
10
Change in adiponectin explains most of the change in HDL particles induced by lifestyle intervention but not metformin treatment in the Diabetes Prevention Program.脂联素的变化解释了生活方式干预而非二甲双胍治疗在糖尿病预防计划中所诱导的高密度脂蛋白颗粒变化的大部分情况。
Metabolism. 2016 May;65(5):764-775. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-based differences in the predictive significance of the waist circumference glucose index for future diabetes risk.腰围血糖指数对未来糖尿病风险预测意义的性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07671-6.
2
Using Metabolic Testing to Personalize Behavioral Obesity Treatment.利用代谢测试实现行为性肥胖治疗的个性化。
Obes Sci Pract. 2025 Mar 11;11(2):e70065. doi: 10.1002/osp4.70065. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Sex differences in skeletal muscle metabolism in exercise and type 2 diabetes mellitus.运动与2型糖尿病中骨骼肌代谢的性别差异。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2025 Mar;21(3):166-179. doi: 10.1038/s41574-024-01058-9. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
4
Assessing the evidence for health benefits of low-level weight loss: a systematic review.评估低水平体重减轻对健康益处的证据:一项系统综述。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2025 Feb;49(2):254-268. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01664-7. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
5
Sex-Specific Variation in Metabolic Responses to Diet.饮食对代谢的影响存在性别差异。
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 1;16(17):2921. doi: 10.3390/nu16172921.
6
Association between exercise habits and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with thyroid cancer: nationwide population-based study.甲状腺癌患者运动习惯与 2 型糖尿病发病风险的相关性:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Jun 18;22(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03472-2.
7
General or Central Obesity and Mortality Among US Hispanic and Latino Adults.美国西班牙裔和拉丁裔成年人的一般或中心型肥胖与死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2351070. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.51070.
8
Interactions among insulin resistance, epigenetics, and donor sex in gene expression regulation of iPSC-derived myoblasts.胰岛素抵抗、表观遗传学和供体性别在 iPSC 衍生的成肌细胞基因表达调控中的相互作用。
J Clin Invest. 2024 Jan 16;134(2):e172333. doi: 10.1172/JCI172333.
9
Why does type 2 diabetes mellitus impair weight reduction in patients with obesity? A review.2型糖尿病为何会妨碍肥胖患者减轻体重?一项综述。
Obes Pillars. 2023 Jun 13;7:100076. doi: 10.1016/j.obpill.2023.100076. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Sex differences in energy metabolism: natural selection, mechanisms and consequences.性别的能量代谢差异:自然选择、机制和后果。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2024 Jan;20(1):56-69. doi: 10.1038/s41581-023-00781-2. Epub 2023 Nov 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality trends in men and women with diabetes, 1971 to 2000.1971年至2000年糖尿病男性和女性的死亡率趋势。
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Aug 7;147(3):149-55. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-3-200708070-00167. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
2
Beneficial associations of physical activity with 2-h but not fasting blood glucose in Australian adults: the AusDiab study.澳大利亚成年人中身体活动与2小时血糖而非空腹血糖的有益关联:澳大利亚糖尿病、肥胖和生活方式研究(AusDiab研究)
Diabetes Care. 2006 Dec;29(12):2598-604. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0313.
3
Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomised controlled trial.罗格列酮对糖耐量受损或空腹血糖受损患者糖尿病发生频率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2006 Sep 23;368(9541):1096-105. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69420-8.
4
Effect of weight loss with lifestyle intervention on risk of diabetes.生活方式干预减重对糖尿病风险的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2006 Sep;29(9):2102-7. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0560.
5
Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study.52个国家中与心肌梗死相关的潜在可改变风险因素的影响(INTERHEART研究):病例对照研究
Lancet. 2004;364(9438):937-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9.
6
Gender differences in the prevalence of impaired fasting glycaemia and impaired glucose tolerance in Mauritius. Does sex matter?毛里求斯空腹血糖受损和糖耐量受损患病率的性别差异。性别有影响吗?
Diabet Med. 2003 Nov;20(11):915-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.01059.x.
7
The natural history of progression from normal glucose tolerance to type 2 diabetes in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging.巴尔的摩纵向衰老研究中从正常糖耐受到2型糖尿病进展的自然史。
Diabetes. 2003 Jun;52(6):1475-84. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.6.1475.
8
NCEP-defined metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and prevalence of coronary heart disease among NHANES III participants age 50 years and older.美国国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)III中50岁及以上参与者的美国国家胆固醇教育计划(NCEP)定义的代谢综合征、糖尿病及冠心病患病率。
Diabetes. 2003 May;52(5):1210-4. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.5.1210.
9
Relative role of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction in the progression to type 2 diabetes--The Kinmen Study.胰岛素抵抗和β细胞功能障碍在2型糖尿病进展中的相对作用——金门研究
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2003 Mar;59(3):225-32. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(02)00249-8.
10
Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events.C反应蛋白与低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平在首次心血管事件预测中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 14;347(20):1557-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021993.

糖尿病预防计划中糖尿病风险的性别差异及强化生活方式干预的效果

Sex differences in diabetes risk and the effect of intensive lifestyle modification in the Diabetes Prevention Program.

作者信息

Perreault Leigh, Ma Yong, Dagogo-Jack Sam, Horton Edward, Marrero David, Crandall Jill, Barrett-Connor Elizabeth

机构信息

University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2008 Jul;31(7):1416-21. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2390. Epub 2008 Mar 20.

DOI:10.2337/dc07-2390
PMID:18356403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2453677/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In participants of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) randomized to intensive lifestyle modification (ILS), meeting ILS goals strongly correlated with prevention of diabetes in the group as a whole. Men met significantly more ILS goals than women but had a similar incidence of diabetes. Therefore, we explored sex differences in risk factors for diabetes and the effect of ILS on risk factors.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Baseline risk factors for diabetes and percent change in risk factors over the first year in men versus women were compared using Wilcoxon's rank-sum tests.

RESULTS

At baseline, men were older and had a larger waist circumference; higher fasting plasma glucose concentration, caloric intake, and blood pressure; and lower HDL cholesterol and corrected insulin response than women, who were less physically active and had a higher BMI (P < 0.01 for all comparisons). Over the first year of the DPP, no sex difference in risk factors for diabetes was observed for those who lost <3% body weight. Weight loss of 3-7% body weight yielded greater decreases in 2-h glucose (P < 0.01), insulin concentration (P < 0.04), and insulin resistance (P < 0.03) in men than in women. Weight loss of >7% body weight resulted in greater decreases in 2-h glucose (P < 0.01), triglyceride level (P < 0.01), and A1C (P < 0.03) in men than in women.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight loss >3% body weight yielded greater reduction in risk factors for diabetes in men than in women. Despite the more favorable effects of ILS in men, baseline risk factors were more numerous in men and likely obscured any sex difference in incident diabetes.

摘要

目的

在糖尿病预防计划(DPP)中,随机分配至强化生活方式干预(ILS)组的参与者,实现ILS目标与整个组预防糖尿病密切相关。男性实现的ILS目标显著多于女性,但糖尿病发病率相似。因此,我们探讨了糖尿病危险因素的性别差异以及ILS对危险因素的影响。

研究设计与方法

使用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较男性与女性糖尿病的基线危险因素以及第一年危险因素的百分比变化。

结果

在基线时,男性年龄更大,腰围更大;空腹血糖浓度、热量摄入和血压更高;高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和校正胰岛素反应低于女性,而女性身体活动较少且体重指数较高(所有比较P<0.01)。在DPP的第一年,体重减轻<3%的人群中未观察到糖尿病危险因素的性别差异。体重减轻3-7%时,男性2小时血糖(P<0.01)、胰岛素浓度(P<0.04)和胰岛素抵抗(P<0.03)的下降幅度大于女性。体重减轻>7%时,男性2小时血糖(P<0.01)、甘油三酯水平(P<0.01)和糖化血红蛋白(P<0.03)的下降幅度大于女性。

结论

体重减轻>3%时,男性糖尿病危险因素的降低幅度大于女性。尽管ILS对男性的影响更有利,但男性的基线危险因素更多,可能掩盖了糖尿病发病方面的任何性别差异。