Houenou J, Szöke A, Méary A, Loze J Y, Mathieu F, Leboyer M, Schürhoff F
AP-HP, groupe Henri-Mondor--Albert-Chenevier, pôle de psychiatrie, 94000 Créteil, France.
Encephale. 2007 Oct;33(5):744-50. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2006.08.002.
This report describes the psychometric evaluation of the French translation of the Signs and Symptoms of Psychotic Illness (SSPI) scale. The SSPI scale was designed to assess the five main clusters of symptoms of people suffering from psychotic disorders (psychomotor poverty, reality distortion, disorganisation, depression, and psychomotor excitation) across diagnostic entities. This new tool has been built by Liddle because, in the existing scales assessing psychotic symptoms, individual items cover symptoms that belong to different pathophysiological processes. The SSPI scale comprises 20 items. Its interview is semi-standardised and typically lasts around 25 min. The English version of this scale has shown good psychometric properties (inter-rater reliability, factor structure).
We used the SSPI ratings of 81 patients with psychotic symptoms to assess its factor structure and concurrent validity with the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale. Twenty-eight videotaped ratings were used to calculate the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) as a measure of inter-rater reliability.
The sample was composed of 46 schizophrenic subjects, 14 with schizoaffective disorder, three with major depressive episode with psychotic features, nine with manic episode with psychotic features and nine with other psychotic disorders. A principal component analysis was conducted to determine the factor structure. Using the Cattell test, we retained a five-factor solution. This solution explained 56.9% of the variance. After varimax rotation, 18 items were attributed to a unique factor. The five factors were: a psychomotor poverty factor, a reality distortion factor, a disorganised factor, an anxious/depressive factor and a psychomotor excitation factor. This structure is close to the original one. The inter-rater reliability of the French version of the SSPI was satisfactory for 18 items, with a mean ICC of 0.64 for the individual items, and an ICC of 0.76 for the global scale. Only two items had an unsatisfactory ICC. This scale showed a good correlation with the CGI scale, with a correlation coefficient between CGI score and SSPI global score of 0.64. Among the factor scores, reality distortion, disorganisation and depression factor scores exhibited a significant correlation with the CGI score.
The French version of the SSPI scale has good psychometric properties, similar to the English version. Furthermore, its factor structure is similar to the English one. This scale is a robust instrument to rate psychotic symptoms and dimensions across diagnosis entities.
本报告描述了精神病性疾病症状与体征(SSPI)量表法语翻译版的心理测量学评估。SSPI量表旨在评估精神病性障碍患者(精神运动迟缓、现实扭曲、紊乱、抑郁和精神运动性兴奋)五个主要症状群,涵盖不同诊断类型。该新工具由利德尔编制,因为在现有的评估精神病性症状的量表中,个别条目涵盖了属于不同病理生理过程的症状。SSPI量表包含20个条目。其访谈为半标准化,通常持续约25分钟。该量表的英文版已显示出良好的心理测量学特性(评分者间信度、因子结构)。
我们使用81例有精神病性症状患者的SSPI评分来评估其因子结构,并与临床总体印象(CGI)量表进行同时效度分析。使用28份录像评分计算组内相关系数(ICC),作为评分者间信度的指标。
样本包括46例精神分裂症患者、14例精神分裂症伴情感障碍患者、3例伴有精神病性特征的重度抑郁发作患者、9例伴有精神病性特征的躁狂发作患者和9例其他精神病性障碍患者。进行主成分分析以确定因子结构。使用卡特尔检验,我们保留了一个五因子解。该解解释了56.9%的方差。经过方差最大化旋转后,18个条目归为一个独特因子。这五个因子分别是:精神运动迟缓因子、现实扭曲因子、紊乱因子、焦虑/抑郁因子和精神运动性兴奋因子。该结构与原结构相近。SSPI法语版18个条目的评分者间信度令人满意,单个条目的平均ICC为0.64,总量表的ICC为0.76。只有两个条目的ICC不令人满意。该量表与CGI量表显示出良好的相关性,CGI评分与SSPI总量表评分之间的相关系数为0.64。在因子得分中,现实扭曲、紊乱和抑郁因子得分与CGI评分显著相关。
SSPI量表法语版具有良好的心理测量学特性,与英文版相似。此外,其因子结构与英文版相似。该量表是评估不同诊断类型精神病性症状及维度的可靠工具。