• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每日单次与三次激活干扰物:干扰频率对骨再生数量和结构无显著影响。

Single versus triple daily activation of the distractor: no significant effects of frequency of distraction on bone regenerate quantity and architecture.

作者信息

Djasim Urville Mardijanto, Wolvius Eppo Bonne, Van Neck Johan Wilhelm, Van Wamel Annemieke, Weinans Harrie, Van Der Wal Karel George Hendrik

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (Chair: Prof. K.G.H. van der Wal, DDS, MD, PhD).

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (Chair: Prof. K.G.H. van der Wal, DDS, MD, PhD).

出版信息

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008 Apr;36(3):143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.11.002. Epub 2008 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2007.11.002
PMID:18359239
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study the effect of two different frequencies of distraction on the quantity and architecture of bone regenerate using micro-computed tomography, and to determine whether radiographic and ultrasonographic bone-fill scores provide reliable predictive value for the amount of new bone in the distraction area.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-six skeletally mature rabbits underwent three full days of latency, after which midface distraction was started. Low-frequency group (n=12): a distraction rate of 0.9 mm/d achieved by one daily activation for 11 days to create a 10mm distraction gap. High-frequency group (n=12): idem, but three daily activations were used instead of one. Control group (n=2) underwent no distraction. After 21 days of consolidation, bone-fill in the distraction area was assessed by means of ultrasonography and radiography. Micro-computed tomography was used to quantify new bone formation and bone architecture.

RESULTS

Relative bone volume (BV/TV) showed a tendency towards a difference (P=0.09) between the low and high-frequency groups. No significant differences were found for bone architecture. No significant correlation between BV/TV values and bone-fill scores was found.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in rhythm from one to three activations daily does not create significantly more bone. Bone-fill score values provided no reliable predictive value for the amount of new bone formation.

摘要

目的

使用微型计算机断层扫描研究两种不同频率的牵张对骨再生的数量和结构的影响,并确定放射学和超声骨填充评分是否能为牵张区域新骨量提供可靠的预测价值。

材料与方法

26只骨骼成熟的兔子经过三天的潜伏期,之后开始进行面中部牵张。低频组(n = 12):通过每日一次激活,以0.9毫米/天的牵张速率持续11天,形成10毫米的牵张间隙。高频组(n = 12):同样如此,但改为每日三次激活而非一次。对照组(n = 2)未进行牵张。在巩固21天后,通过超声和放射学评估牵张区域的骨填充情况。使用微型计算机断层扫描对新骨形成和骨结构进行量化。

结果

低频组和高频组之间的相对骨体积(BV/TV)显示出有差异的趋势(P = 0.09)。在骨结构方面未发现显著差异。BV/TV值与骨填充评分之间未发现显著相关性。

结论

每日激活次数从一次增加到三次并没有显著增加骨生成。骨填充评分值对新骨形成量没有提供可靠的预测价值。

相似文献

1
Single versus triple daily activation of the distractor: no significant effects of frequency of distraction on bone regenerate quantity and architecture.每日单次与三次激活干扰物:干扰频率对骨再生数量和结构无显著影响。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008 Apr;36(3):143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.11.002. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
2
Continuous versus discontinuous distraction: evaluation of bone regenerate following various rhythms of distraction.持续牵引与间断牵引:不同牵引节律下骨再生的评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;67(4):818-26. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.016.
3
Effects of latency on the quality and quantity of bone produced by dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis.潜伏期对牙牙槽骨牵张成骨所产生的骨质量和数量的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Oct;140(4):470-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.05.016.
4
Histomorphometric comparison between continuous and discontinuous distraction osteogenesis.连续性与非连续性牵张成骨的组织形态计量学比较
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009 Oct;37(7):398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.03.006. Epub 2009 May 19.
5
How does the rate of dentoalveolar distraction affect the bone regenerate produced?牙牙槽骨牵张的速度是如何影响再生骨的产生的?
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):e211-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.018.
6
Evaluation of cranial bone transport distraction with and without adipose grafting.有脂肪移植和无脂肪移植情况下颅骨牵张成骨的评估。
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 May;25(3):766-71. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000769.
7
bFGF-Modified BMMSCs enhance bone regeneration following distraction osteogenesis in rabbits.bFGF 修饰的 BMMSCs 增强兔牵张成骨后骨再生。
Bone. 2010 Apr;46(4):1156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.12.017. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
8
Evaluation of bone regenerative capacity following distraction osteogenesis of goat mandibles using two different bone cutting techniques.使用两种不同截骨技术对山羊下颌骨牵张成骨后的骨再生能力进行评估。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Apr;42(3):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
9
Microstructural and strength evaluation of regenerate tissue during the consolidation period after vertical mandibular ramus distraction.下颌支垂直牵张成骨巩固期再生组织的微观结构与强度评估
J Craniofac Surg. 2005 Sep;16(5):805-11. doi: 10.1097/01.scs.0000179663.76289.78.
10
Transsutural distraction osteogenesis applied to maxillary complex with new internalized distraction device: analysis of the feasibility and long-term osteogenesis outcome.
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Mar;26(2):402-7. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001263.