Suppr超能文献

除肾素-血管紧张素系统拮抗剂外,醛固酮拮抗剂用于预防慢性肾脏病进展。

Aldosterone antagonists in addition to renin angiotensin system antagonists for preventing the progression of chronic kidney disease.

作者信息

Chung Edmund Ym, Ruospo Marinella, Natale Patrizia, Bolignano Davide, Navaneethan Sankar D, Palmer Suetonia C, Strippoli Giovanni Fm

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 27;10(10):CD007004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007004.pub4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) is used to reduce proteinuria and retard the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, resolution of proteinuria may be incomplete with these therapies and the addition of an aldosterone antagonist may be added to further prevent progression of CKD. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009 and updated in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of aldosterone antagonists (selective (eplerenone), non-selective (spironolactone or canrenone), or non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists (finerenone)) in adults who have CKD with proteinuria (nephrotic and non-nephrotic range) on: patient-centred endpoints including kidney failure (previously know as end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)), major cardiovascular events, and death (any cause); kidney function (proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and doubling of serum creatinine); blood pressure; and adverse events (including hyperkalaemia, acute kidney injury, and gynaecomastia).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 13 January 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared aldosterone antagonists in combination with ACEi or ARB (or both) to other anti-hypertensive strategies or placebo in participants with proteinuric CKD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Data were summarised using random effects meta-analysis. We expressed summary treatment estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, or standardised mean difference (SMD) when different scales were used together with their 95% confidence interval (CI). Risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane tool. Evidence certainty was evaluated using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-four studies (5745 participants) were included. Risk of bias in the evaluated methodological domains were unclear or high risk in most studies. Adequate random sequence generation was present in 12 studies, allocation concealment in five studies, blinding of participant and investigators in 18 studies, blinding of outcome assessment in 15 studies, and complete outcome reporting in 24 studies. All studies comparing aldosterone antagonists to placebo or standard care were used in addition to an ACEi or ARB (or both). None of the studies were powered to detect differences in patient-level outcomes including kidney failure, major cardiovascular events or death. Aldosterone antagonists had uncertain effects on kidney failure (2 studies, 84 participants: RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.33 to 27.65, I² = 0%; very low certainty evidence), death (3 studies, 421 participants: RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.10 to 3.50, I² = 0%; low certainty evidence), and cardiovascular events (3 studies, 1067 participants: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.56; I² = 42%; low certainty evidence) compared to placebo or standard care. Aldosterone antagonists may reduce protein excretion (14 studies, 1193 participants: SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.20, I² = 82%; very low certainty evidence), eGFR (13 studies, 1165 participants, MD -3.00 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI -5.51 to -0.49, I² = 0%, low certainty evidence) and systolic blood pressure (14 studies, 911 participants: MD -4.98 mmHg, 95% CI -8.22 to -1.75, I² = 87%; very low certainty evidence) compared to placebo or standard care. Aldosterone antagonists probably increase the risk of hyperkalaemia (17 studies, 3001 participants: RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.47 to 3.22, I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence), acute kidney injury (5 studies, 1446 participants: RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.97, I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence), and gynaecomastia (4 studies, 281 participants: RR 5.14, 95% CI 1.14 to 23.23, I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence) compared to placebo or standard care. Non-selective aldosterone antagonists plus ACEi or ARB had uncertain effects on protein excretion (2 studies, 139 participants: SMD -1.59, 95% CI -3.80 to 0.62, I² = 93%; very low certainty evidence) but may increase serum potassium (2 studies, 121 participants: MD 0.31 mEq/L, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.45, I² = 0%; low certainty evidence) compared to diuretics plus ACEi or ARB. Selective aldosterone antagonists may increase the risk of hyperkalaemia (2 studies, 500 participants: RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.95, I² = 0%; low certainty evidence) compared ACEi or ARB (or both). There were insufficient studies to perform meta-analyses for the comparison between non-selective aldosterone antagonists and calcium channel blockers, selective aldosterone antagonists plus ACEi or ARB (or both) and nitrate plus ACEi or ARB (or both), and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists and selective aldosterone antagonists.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The effects of aldosterone antagonists when added to ACEi or ARB (or both) on the risks of death, major cardiovascular events, and kidney failure in people with proteinuric CKD are uncertain. Aldosterone antagonists may reduce proteinuria, eGFR, and systolic blood pressure in adults who have mild to moderate CKD but may increase the risk of hyperkalaemia, acute kidney injury and gynaecomastia when added to ACEi and/or ARB.

摘要

背景

使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)进行治疗,旨在减少蛋白尿并延缓慢性肾脏病(CKD)的进展。然而,这些疗法可能无法完全消除蛋白尿,添加醛固酮拮抗剂可能有助于进一步预防CKD的进展。这是一篇Cochrane系统评价的更新,该评价首次发表于2009年,并于2014年进行了更新。

目的

评估醛固酮拮抗剂(选择性(依普利酮)、非选择性(螺内酯或坎利酮)或非甾体盐皮质激素拮抗剂(非奈利酮))对患有蛋白尿(肾病范围和非肾病范围)的CKD成人患者的以下影响:以患者为中心的终点,包括肾衰竭(以前称为终末期肾病(ESKD))、主要心血管事件和死亡(任何原因);肾功能(蛋白尿、估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和血清肌酐翻倍);血压;以及不良事件(包括高钾血症、急性肾损伤和男性乳房发育)。

检索方法

我们通过与信息专家联系,使用与本评价相关的检索词,检索了截至2020年1月13日的Cochrane肾脏和移植研究注册库。注册库中的研究通过检索CENTRAL、MEDLINE、EMBASE、会议论文集、国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)检索门户和ClinicalTrials.gov来识别。

入选标准

我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)和半随机对照试验,这些试验比较了醛固酮拮抗剂联合ACEi或ARB(或两者)与其他抗高血压策略或安慰剂在蛋白尿性CKD患者中的疗效。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立评估研究质量并提取数据。数据采用随机效应荟萃分析进行汇总。我们将汇总治疗估计值表示为二分类结局的风险比(RR)和连续结局的平均差(MD),或在使用不同量表时的标准化平均差(SMD)及其95%置信区间(CI)。使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险。使用GRADE评估证据确定性。

主要结果

纳入了44项研究(5745名参与者)。在大多数研究中,评估的方法学领域的偏倚风险不明确或为高风险。12项研究存在充分的随机序列生成,5项研究存在分配隐藏,18项研究对参与者和研究者实施了盲法,15项研究对结局评估实施了盲法,24项研究有完整的结局报告。所有比较醛固酮拮抗剂与安慰剂或标准治疗的研究均在使用ACEi或ARB(或两者)的基础上进行。没有一项研究有足够的效力来检测包括肾衰竭、主要心血管事件或死亡在内的患者水平结局的差异。与安慰剂或标准治疗相比,醛固酮拮抗剂对肾衰竭(2项研究,84名参与者:RR 3.00,95%CI 0.33至27.65,I² = 0%;极低确定性证据)、死亡(3项研究,421名参与者:RR 0.58,95%CI 0.10至3.50,I² = 0%;低确定性证据)和心血管事件(3项研究,1067名参与者:RR 0.95,95%CI 0.26至3.56;I² = 42%;低确定性证据)的影响不确定。与安慰剂或标准治疗相比,醛固酮拮抗剂可能会减少蛋白质排泄(14项研究,1193名参与者:SMD -0.51,95%CI -0.82至-0.20,I² = 82%;极低确定性证据)、降低eGFR(13项研究,1165名参与者,MD -3.00 mL/min/1.73 m²,95%CI -5.51至-0.49,I² = 0%,低确定性证据)和收缩压(14项研究,911名参与者:MD -4.98 mmHg,95%CI -8.22至-1.75,I² = 87%;极低确定性证据)。与安慰剂或标准治疗相比,醛固酮拮抗剂可能会增加高钾血症(17项研究,3,001名参与者:RR 2.17,95%CI 1.47至3.22,I² = 0%;中度确定性证据)、急性肾损伤(5项研究,1,446名参与者:RR 2.04,95%CI 1.05至3.97,I² = 0%;中度确定性证据)和男性乳房发育(4项研究,281名参与者:RR 5.14,95%CI 1.14至23.23,I² = 0%;中度确定性证据)的风险。与利尿剂联合ACEi或ARB相比,非选择性醛固酮拮抗剂联合ACEi或ARB对蛋白质排泄的影响不确定(2项研究,139名参与者:SMD -1.59,95%CI -3.80至0.62,I² = 93%;极低确定性证据),但可能会增加血清钾(2项研究,121名参与者:MD 0.31 mEq/L,95%CI 0.17至0.45,I² = 0%;低确定性证据)。与ACEi或ARB(或两者)相比,选择性醛固酮拮抗剂可能会增加高钾血症的风险(2项研究,500名参与者:RR 1.62,95%CI 0.66至3.95,I² = 0%;低确定性证据)。对于非选择性醛固酮拮抗剂与钙通道阻滞剂、选择性醛固酮拮抗剂联合ACEi或ARB(或两者)与硝酸盐联合ACEi或ARB(或两者)以及非甾体盐皮质激素拮抗剂与选择性醛固酮拮抗剂之间的比较,没有足够的研究进行荟萃分析。

作者结论

在ACEi或ARB(或两者)基础上添加醛固酮拮抗剂对蛋白尿性CKD患者的死亡、主要心血管事件和肾衰竭风险的影响尚不确定。醛固酮拮抗剂可能会减少轻度至中度CKD成人患者的蛋白尿、降低eGFR和收缩压,但在添加到ACEi和/或ARB时,可能会增加高钾血症、急性肾损伤和男性乳房发育的风险。

相似文献

3
Antihypertensive treatment for kidney transplant recipients.肾移植受者的降压治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 31;7(7):CD003598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003598.pub3.
10
Immunosuppressive agents for treating IgA nephropathy.用于治疗IgA肾病的免疫抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 12;3(3):CD003965. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003965.pub3.

引用本文的文献

10
The interplay between heart failure and chronic kidney disease.心力衰竭与慢性肾脏病之间的相互作用。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jul;27(7):3568-3582. doi: 10.1111/dom.16371. Epub 2025 Apr 21.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验