Dennis-Rouse Melissa D, Davidson Judy E
Emergency Department, Palomar Pomerado Health, Escondido, California 92025, USA.
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2008 Apr-Jun;31(2):150-60. doi: 10.1097/01.CNQ.0000314475.56754.08.
Adverse outcomes related to tracheal occlusion and peritracheal skin breakdown stimulated a review of tracheostomy care. An evidence-based practice approach was taken to evaluate the problem. Organizational tracheostomy care policies were reviewed. Subcategories related to tracheostomy care were queried including securing devices, sutures and their removal, type and choice of dressings, prevention of skin breakdown, frequency of care and role delineation, and suctioning. A literature review was done. National experts were surveyed. A geographical survey was taken and vendors of tracheostomy products were interviewed. Collected evidence was scored along a continuum. Costs of supplies were evaluated. Physicians, staff, and patients were interviewed. Skin maceration on the neck was found on multiple audits. The type of tie was identified as a problem. Nurses and respiratory therapists reported difficulty providing tracheostomy care due to suturing technique and securing methods. The stocked dressing was too large to fit under sutures. Several conflicting policies existed regarding tracheostomy care, none of which identified responsibility for performing care: respiratory versus nursing or time standards for care. New supplies were trialed. A list of practice changes were agreed upon by respiratory, nursing, and medical staff. Primary responsibility for tracheostomy care was shifted to the registered nurse.
与气管阻塞和气管周围皮肤破损相关的不良后果促使人们对气管造口护理进行了回顾。采用循证实践方法来评估该问题。对机构的气管造口护理政策进行了审查。查询了与气管造口护理相关的子类别,包括固定装置、缝线及其拆除、敷料的类型和选择、预防皮肤破损、护理频率和职责划分以及吸痰。进行了文献综述。对全国专家进行了调查。进行了地理调查并采访了气管造口产品供应商。对收集到的证据进行了连续评分。评估了用品成本。对医生、工作人员和患者进行了访谈。多次审计发现颈部皮肤浸渍。领带类型被确定为一个问题。护士和呼吸治疗师报告称,由于缝合技术和固定方法,提供气管造口护理存在困难。库存的敷料太大,无法放在缝线下面。关于气管造口护理存在几项相互冲突的政策,其中没有一项明确了护理的责任:呼吸科与护理或护理的时间标准。试用了新用品。呼吸科、护理和医务人员就一系列实践变更达成了一致。气管造口护理的主要责任转移给了注册护士。