Suppr超能文献

支付意愿:哮喘或喘息儿童的照料者。

Willingness-to-pay for caregivers of children with asthma or wheezing conditions.

出版信息

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007 Mar;3(1):157-65. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.2007.3.1.157.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nearly 5 million children in the United States are affected by asthma, which is more than 5% of the population younger than 18 years. In children four years or younger, the prevalence increased 160% from 1980 to 1994. There are several effective drugs that relieve the symptoms of asthma and others are currently being developed, but even when these medications are prescribed, they may be underutilized because parents fear the possibility of adverse events. There is no knowledge whether caregivers would be willing to pay (WTP) for safe and effective medications in general.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

IN A CONJOINT ANALYSIS, THE STATUS QUO AND HYPOTHETICAL TREATMENT OPTIONS ARE DEFINED BY FOUR ATTRIBUTES: episode-free days, risk of exacerbation, information available on the long-term impact of the treatment, and out-of-pocket expenses. Based on random utility theory, a binary purchase decision equation is specified and estimated using probit. Several tests were performed with regards to the scaling of the attribute variables, the linearity of the utility function used, and the derivation of a final model.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Marginal willingness-to-pay per month for 20 additional episode-free days due to a new treatment turns out to be US$6.00. An interesting question from the (industry) policy point of view for possible new products is the amount of WTP for the product as a whole. Assuming that the final model is correctly specified, the (negative) constant may be interpreted as indicating that caregivers feel confident with the asthma treatment options already on the market and having hence not a positive relation to a new treatment.

摘要

背景

美国有近 500 万儿童患有哮喘,占 18 岁以下人口的 5%以上。在 4 岁或 4 岁以下的儿童中,其发病率从 1980 年到 1994 年增加了 160%。有几种缓解哮喘症状的有效药物,还有其他药物正在开发中,但即使开出了这些药物,也可能因家长担心不良反应而未被充分使用。目前尚不清楚护理人员是否愿意为一般安全有效的药物支付(WTP)。

材料和方法

在联合分析中,通过四个属性定义现状和假设的治疗方案:无发作天数、恶化风险、有关治疗长期影响的信息和自付费用。基于随机效用理论,指定并使用概率单位进行二进制购买决策方程的估计。针对属性变量的标度、使用的效用函数的线性度以及最终模型的推导,进行了多项检验。

结果和结论

由于新治疗方法每月可增加 20 天无发作天数,每月的边际支付意愿为 6 美元。从(行业)政策角度来看,新产品的一个有趣问题是对整个产品的支付意愿。假设最终模型正确指定,则(负)常数可解释为表明护理人员对市场上现有的哮喘治疗方案有信心,因此与新的治疗方法没有积极关系。

相似文献

2
What do parents want from their child's asthma treatment?家长希望从孩子的哮喘治疗中得到什么?
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007 Mar;3(1):167-75. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.2007.3.1.167.

本文引用的文献

1
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
10
Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management.运用联合分析评估女性对流产管理的偏好。
Health Econ. 1997 May-Jun;6(3):261-73. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199705)6:3<261::aid-hec262>3.0.co;2-n.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验