Tan Charles T K, Cheah W K, Delbridge Leigh
Department of Surgery, Endocrine Surgical Division, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, Singapore.
World J Surg. 2008 Jul;32(7):1349-57. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9555-3.
Excision of the thyroid through a skin crease incision in the anterior neck provides good direct exposure to facilitate safe dissection and a quick operation with low morbidity and minimal mortality. However, these patients still have a scar in the neck. Technologic innovations have allowed surgeons to remove the thyroid gland from a remote site, providing a scarless outcome in the neck. This study was designed to assess the different techniques of scarless (in the neck) endoscopic thyroidectomy (SET) by reviewing the current literature.
A computer-assisted search of the Medline database through September 2007 was undertaken. The combination of terms used included the following: endoscopic thyroidectomy; minimally invasive thyroidectomy; minimally invasive endocrine surgery; thyroidectomy via the axillary approach; thyroidectomy via the anterior approach; and thyroidectomy via the breast approach. Additional data were provided based on previously unpublished experience from our own unit with SET.
There were seven studies that involved 186 patients in whom the thyroid was excised via the axillary method and five published series that involved 169 patients who had thyroidectomies performed via the anterior approach. There were four published series of thyroidectomies performed via a hybrid approach, which is a combination of both the anterior and axillary approach, involving 180 patients. Four studies compared SET and another approach for a thyroidectomy. In our unpublished series of SET, we performed 20 cases during a 2-year period comprising 11 cases via the axillary approach and 9 cases via the anterior/breast approach. Nineteen cases were lobectomies and one case was an isthmusectomy. SET was associated with a longer operative time and increase postoperative pain. Patients who had SET were satisfied with the aesthetic outcome of the procedure.
Scarless (in the neck) endoscopic thyroidectomy is not a minimally invasive technique but a maximally invasive one that involves a longer operative time and greater postoperative pain. What it does provide is a safe excision of the thyroid pathology with the absence of a scar in the neck. However, there is a steep learning curve. With experience and newer surgical instruments, the operative time and postoperative pain might decrease.
通过颈部前方皮肤褶皱切口切除甲状腺可提供良好的直接暴露,便于安全解剖,手术快速,发病率低且死亡率极低。然而,这些患者颈部仍会留下疤痕。技术创新使外科医生能够从远处部位切除甲状腺,颈部不留疤痕。本研究旨在通过回顾当前文献评估无疤痕(颈部)内镜甲状腺切除术(SET)的不同技术。
对截至2007年9月的Medline数据库进行计算机辅助检索。使用的检索词组合如下:内镜甲状腺切除术;微创甲状腺切除术;微创内分泌手术;经腋窝入路甲状腺切除术;经前路甲状腺切除术;经乳房入路甲状腺切除术。还根据我们自己科室关于SET的未发表经验提供了其他数据。
有7项研究涉及186例通过腋窝法切除甲状腺的患者,5个已发表的系列研究涉及169例经前路进行甲状腺切除术的患者。有4个已发表的系列研究涉及通过联合入路(前路和腋窝入路相结合)进行的甲状腺切除术,涉及180例患者。4项研究比较了SET与另一种甲状腺切除方法。在我们未发表的SET系列研究中,我们在2年期间进行了20例手术,其中11例经腋窝入路,9例经前路/乳房入路。19例为叶切除术,1例为峡部切除术。SET与手术时间延长和术后疼痛增加有关。接受SET的患者对手术的美学效果满意。
无疤痕(颈部)内镜甲状腺切除术并非微创技术,而是一种具有更长手术时间和更剧烈术后疼痛的最大程度侵入性技术。它所提供的是安全切除甲状腺病变且颈部无疤痕。然而,学习曲线较陡。随着经验的积累和更新的手术器械,手术时间和术后疼痛可能会减少。