Suppr超能文献

[纳粹社会主义时代的精神病学]

[Psychiatry in the era of national socialism].

作者信息

Blasius D

机构信息

Universität GHS Essen.

出版信息

Sudhoffs Arch. 1991;75(1):90-105.

PMID:1836080
Abstract

The question of the responsibility of medical science during National Socialism has proved a controversial subject. Psychiatry especially has been charged with complicity in the killing of psychiatric patients. Psychiatry as a scientific system, however, is not identical with the racial psychiatry of National Socialism. Ernst Rüdin was the most prominent representative of Nazi psychiatry. But even in the time of National Socialism there were important scientists who attempted to preserve the traditions of psychiatry. Among them were Kurt Schneider and Karl Bonhoeffer. By examining new sources the present essay attempts to demonstrate, with special reference to persons and institutions (Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Psychiatrie), the actual situation of psychiatry during the Third Reich. Only specific areas of psychiatry may be found guilty of misdeeds, but psychiatry as a whole bears an historical responsibility for the terrible events in Nazi Germany.

摘要

医学在纳粹时期的责任问题已被证明是一个有争议的话题。精神病学尤其被指控参与杀害精神病患者。然而,作为一个科学体系的精神病学与纳粹时期的种族精神病学并不相同。恩斯特·吕丁是纳粹精神病学最杰出的代表。但即使在纳粹时期,也有重要的科学家试图维护精神病学的传统。其中包括库尔特·施奈德和卡尔·博霍费尔。通过研究新的资料来源,本文试图特别提及人物和机构(德国精神病学研究机构)来展示第三帝国时期精神病学的实际情况。可能只有精神病学的特定领域被认定有不当行为,但精神病学作为一个整体对纳粹德国发生的可怕事件负有历史责任。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验