Ritter Hans Jakob, Roelcke Volker
Institut für Geschichte und Epistemologie der Medizin, Univ. Basel, Schanbeinstrasse 20, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Osiris. 2005;20:263-88. doi: 10.1086/649421.
The first research institution worldwide to exclusively devote its research to psychiatric genetics was the Department of Genealogy and Demography at the German Institute for Psychiatric Research (Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Psychiatrie) in Munich, founded in 1917. In 1924, it was integrated into the Kaiser Wilhelm Society. From its foundation until the end of World War II in 1945, the department was directed by the Swiss citizen Ernst Rüdin, one of the protagonists of the racial hygiene movement in Germany. Riidin also initiated the establishment of the Department for Heredity Research (Abteilung für Erbforschung) at the Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Switzerland; from 1932 until 1944, this department was directed by Rüdin's student Carl Brugger. The paper analyzes the development of the research agendas and related practices of both institutions. Instead of using a rather static comparative approach, the focus is on the dynamic interrelationships and mutual dependencies between the two departments and their staffs in the different political contexts of contemporary Germany and Switzerland. This approach reflects the international cross-relations in the field of psychiatric genetics and the factual dominance of the Munich institution at least until the mid-1930s. However, in spite of similar research agendas, the common motivation by eugenic ideas, and close personal relationships, the differing economic resources, research infrastructures, political ramifications, and related value preferences had considerable impact on the development of the two programs.
全球首个专门致力于精神疾病遗传学研究的科研机构是位于慕尼黑的德国精神疾病研究所(Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Psychiatrie)的家谱与人口统计学系,该系成立于1917年。1924年,它并入了凯撒·威廉学会。从成立到1945年第二次世界大战结束,该系由瑞士公民恩斯特·吕丁领导,他是德国种族卫生运动的主要倡导者之一。吕丁还推动在瑞士巴塞尔大学精神病院设立了遗传研究部(Abteilung für Erbforschung);从1932年到1944年,该部门由吕丁的学生卡尔·布鲁格领导。本文分析了这两个机构研究议程及相关实践的发展情况。研究重点并非采用较为静态的比较方法,而是关注在当代德国和瑞士不同政治背景下,这两个部门及其工作人员之间的动态相互关系和相互依存关系。这种方法反映了精神疾病遗传学领域的国际交叉关系,以及至少在20世纪30年代中期之前慕尼黑机构在实际中的主导地位。然而,尽管研究议程相似,受优生学思想的共同推动,且人员关系密切,但不同的经济资源、研究基础设施、政治影响以及相关的价值偏好对这两个项目的发展产生了重大影响。