Heydarpour M, Schaeffer L R, Yazdi M H
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
J Anim Breed Genet. 2008 Apr;125(2):89-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00703.x.
The estimation of (co)variance components for multiple traits with maternal genetic effects was found to be influenced by population structure. Two traits in a closed breeding herd with random mating were simulated over nine generations. Population structures were simulated on the basis of different proportions of dams not having performance records (0, 0.1, 0.5, 0.8 and 0.9): three genetic correlations (-0.5, 0.0 and +0.5) between direct and maternal effects and three genetic correlations (0, 0.3 and 0.8) between two traits. Three ratios of direct to maternal genetic variances, (1:3, 1:1, 3:1), were also considered. Variance components were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood. The proportion of dams without records had an effect on the SE of direct-maternal covariance estimates when the proportion was 0.8 or 0.9 and the true correlation between direct and maternal effects was negative. The ratio of direct to maternal genetic variances influenced the SE of the (co)variance estimates more than the proportion of dams with missing records. The correlation between two traits did not have an effect on the SE of the estimates. The proportion of dams without records and the correlation between direct and maternal effects had the strongest effects on bias of estimates. The largest biases were obtained when the proportion of dams without records was high, the correlation between direct and maternal effects was positive, and the direct variance was greater than the maternal variance, as would be the situation for most growth traits in livestock. Total bias in all parameter estimates for two traits was large in the same situations. Poor population structure can affect both bias and SE of estimates of the direct-maternal genetic correlation, and can explain some of the large negative estimates often obtained.
研究发现,群体结构会影响对具有母体遗传效应的多个性状的(协)方差成分的估计。在一个随机交配的封闭育种群中,对两个性状进行了九代的模拟。基于没有生产记录的母畜的不同比例(0、0.1、0.5、0.8和0.9)模拟群体结构:直接效应与母体效应之间的三种遗传相关性(-0.5、0.0和+0.5)以及两个性状之间的三种遗传相关性(0、0.3和0.8)。还考虑了直接遗传方差与母体遗传方差的三种比例(1:3、1:1、3:1)。通过限制最大似然法估计方差成分。当比例为0.8或0.9且直接效应与母体效应之间的真实相关性为负时,没有记录的母畜比例会对直接-母体协方差估计的标准误产生影响。直接遗传方差与母体遗传方差的比例对方差估计的标准误的影响大于有缺失记录的母畜比例。两个性状之间的相关性对估计的标准误没有影响。没有记录的母畜比例和直接效应与母体效应之间的相关性对估计偏差的影响最大。当没有记录的母畜比例较高、直接效应与母体效应之间的相关性为正且直接方差大于母体方差时,会出现最大偏差,这与家畜中大多数生长性状的情况相同。在相同情况下,两个性状所有参数估计的总偏差都很大。不良的群体结构会影响直接-母体遗传相关性估计的偏差和标准误,并且可以解释经常获得的一些较大的负估计值。