• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模型选择和数据结构对蜜蜂群体遗传参数估计的影响。

Influence of model selection and data structure on the estimation of genetic parameters in honeybee populations.

机构信息

Breeding and Behavior, Institute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, 16540 Hohen Neuendorf, Germany.

出版信息

G3 (Bethesda). 2022 Feb 4;12(2). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab450.

DOI:10.1093/g3journal/jkab450
PMID:35100384
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8824827/
Abstract

Estimating genetic parameters of quantitative traits is a prerequisite for animal breeding. In honeybees, the genetic variance separates into queen and worker effects. However, under data paucity, parameter estimations that account for this peculiarity often yield implausible results. Consequently, simplified models that attribute all genetic contributions to either the queen (queen model) or the workers (worker model) are often used to estimate variance components in honeybees. However, the causes for estimations with the complete model (colony model) to fail and the consequences of simplified models for variance estimates are little understood. We newly developed the necessary theory to compare parameter estimates that were achieved by the colony model with those of the queen and worker models. Furthermore, we performed computer simulations to quantify the influence of model choice, estimation algorithm, true genetic parameters, rates of controlled mating, apiary sizes, and phenotype data completeness on the success of genetic parameter estimations. We found that successful estimations with the colony model were only possible if at least some of the queens mated controlled on mating stations. In that case, estimates were largely unbiased if more than 20% of the colonies had phenotype records. The simplified queen and worker models proved more stable and yielded plausible parameter estimates for almost all settings. Results obtained from these models were unbiased when mating was uncontrolled, but with controlled mating, the simplified models consistently overestimated heritabilities. This study elucidates the requirements for variance component estimation in honeybees and provides the theoretical groundwork for simplified honeybee models.

摘要

估计数量性状的遗传参数是动物育种的前提。在蜜蜂中,遗传方差分为蜂王和工蜂效应。然而,在数据匮乏的情况下,考虑到这一特殊性的参数估计往往会产生不合理的结果。因此,通常使用将所有遗传贡献归因于蜂王(蜂王模型)或工蜂(工蜂模型)的简化模型来估计蜜蜂的方差分量。然而,对于完整模型(群体模型)的估计失败的原因以及简化模型对方差估计的影响还知之甚少。我们新开发了必要的理论来比较群体模型所获得的参数估计与蜂王和工蜂模型的参数估计。此外,我们进行了计算机模拟,以量化模型选择、估计算法、真实遗传参数、受控交配率、蜂场大小和表型数据完整性对遗传参数估计成功的影响。我们发现,如果至少有一些蜂王在交配站进行了受控交配,那么群体模型的成功估计才是可能的。在这种情况下,如果超过 20%的蜂群有表型记录,那么估计值基本上是无偏的。简化的蜂王和工蜂模型被证明更稳定,并且几乎在所有情况下都能产生合理的参数估计值。当交配不受控制时,这些模型获得的结果是无偏的,但当交配受到控制时,简化模型会一直高估遗传力。本研究阐明了蜜蜂方差分量估计的要求,并为简化的蜜蜂模型提供了理论基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c71/8824827/0e40dcfa282e/jkab450f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c71/8824827/a02ab98d3985/jkab450f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c71/8824827/aaefe83a6a7f/jkab450f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c71/8824827/9952361c5697/jkab450f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c71/8824827/17fcaec0851f/jkab450f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c71/8824827/06b32e86e7e9/jkab450f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c71/8824827/0e40dcfa282e/jkab450f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c71/8824827/a02ab98d3985/jkab450f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c71/8824827/aaefe83a6a7f/jkab450f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c71/8824827/9952361c5697/jkab450f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c71/8824827/17fcaec0851f/jkab450f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c71/8824827/06b32e86e7e9/jkab450f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c71/8824827/0e40dcfa282e/jkab450f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of model selection and data structure on the estimation of genetic parameters in honeybee populations.模型选择和数据结构对蜜蜂群体遗传参数估计的影响。
G3 (Bethesda). 2022 Feb 4;12(2). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab450.
2
A simulation study of a honeybee breeding scheme accounting for polyandry, direct and maternal effects on colony performance.一个考虑到多父本交配、直接和母系效应对蜂群性能影响的蜜蜂繁殖方案的模拟研究。
Genet Sel Evol. 2021 Sep 8;53(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12711-021-00665-8.
3
The importance of controlled mating in honeybee breeding.控制交配在蜜蜂养殖中的重要性。
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Dec 12;51(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0518-y.
4
Short-term effects of controlled mating and selection on the genetic variance of honeybee populations.控制交配和选择对蜜蜂种群遗传方差的短期影响。
Heredity (Edinb). 2021 May;126(5):733-747. doi: 10.1038/s41437-021-00411-2. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
5
Uncertainty in the mating strategy of honeybees causes bias and unreliability in the estimates of genetic parameters.蜜蜂交配策略的不确定性导致遗传参数估计的偏差和不可靠性。
Genet Sel Evol. 2024 Apr 17;56(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12711-024-00898-3.
6
Consequences of incorrect genetic parameter estimates for single-trait and multi-trait genetic evaluations in honeybees.错误的遗传参数估计对蜜蜂单性状和多性状遗传评估的后果。
J Anim Breed Genet. 2022 Nov;139(6):666-678. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12728. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
7
A note on genetic parameters and accuracy of estimated breeding values in honey bees.关于蜜蜂遗传参数和估计育种值准确性的注释。
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Nov 27;51(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0510-6.
8
Genetic evaluation of a novel system for controlled mating of the honeybee, Apis mellifera.新型蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)可控交配系统的遗传评估。
J Hered. 2010 May-Jun;101(3):334-8. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esp112. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
9
The number of drones to inseminate a queen with has little potential for optimization of honeybee breeding programs.用多少架无人机给蜂王授精对蜜蜂养殖计划的优化潜力很小。
Hereditas. 2024 Aug 27;161(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s41065-024-00332-0.
10
Male fitness of honeybee colonies (Apis mellifera L.).蜜蜂蜂群(意大利蜜蜂)的雄性适应性
J Evol Biol. 2003 Sep;16(5):914-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00593.x.

引用本文的文献

1
How partial phenotyping to reduce generation intervals can help to increase annual genetic gain in selected honeybee populations.通过部分表型分析来缩短世代间隔如何有助于提高选定蜜蜂种群的年度遗传增益。
Heredity (Edinb). 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1038/s41437-025-00768-8.
2
Sequence-Based Multi Ancestry Association Study Reveals the Polygenic Architecture of Varroa destructor Resistance in the Honeybee Apis mellifera.基于序列的多祖先关联研究揭示了蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)对狄斯瓦螨抗性的多基因结构。
Mol Ecol. 2025 Feb;34(3):e17637. doi: 10.1111/mec.17637. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
3
Uncertainty in the mating strategy of honeybees causes bias and unreliability in the estimates of genetic parameters.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating Genetic and Phenotypic Variability of Queen Bees: Morphological and Reproductive Traits.探究蜂王的遗传和表型变异性:形态学和生殖特征
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 26;11(11):3054. doi: 10.3390/ani11113054.
2
A simulation study of a honeybee breeding scheme accounting for polyandry, direct and maternal effects on colony performance.一个考虑到多父本交配、直接和母系效应对蜂群性能影响的蜜蜂繁殖方案的模拟研究。
Genet Sel Evol. 2021 Sep 8;53(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12711-021-00665-8.
3
Simulation studies to optimize genomic selection in honey bees.
蜜蜂交配策略的不确定性导致遗传参数估计的偏差和不可靠性。
Genet Sel Evol. 2024 Apr 17;56(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12711-024-00898-3.
4
The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding.利用器械授精进行可持续的蜜蜂养殖。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Sep 14;14(9):1799. doi: 10.3390/genes14091799.
优化蜜蜂基因组选择的模拟研究。
Genet Sel Evol. 2021 Jul 29;53(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12711-021-00654-x.
4
Exploring Two Honey Bee Traits for Improving Resistance Against : Development and Genetic Evaluation.探索两种提高蜜蜂抗逆性的性状:发育与遗传评估。
Insects. 2021 Mar 3;12(3):216. doi: 10.3390/insects12030216.
5
Short-term effects of controlled mating and selection on the genetic variance of honeybee populations.控制交配和选择对蜜蜂种群遗传方差的短期影响。
Heredity (Edinb). 2021 May;126(5):733-747. doi: 10.1038/s41437-021-00411-2. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
6
A theoretical derivation of response to selection with and without controlled mating in honeybees.有控制交配和无控制交配情况下蜜蜂对选择的反应的理论推导。
Genet Sel Evol. 2021 Feb 17;53(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12711-021-00606-5.
7
Authoritative subspecies diagnosis tool for European honey bees based on ancestry informative SNPs.基于祖先信息单核苷酸多态性的欧洲蜜蜂权威亚种诊断工具。
BMC Genomics. 2021 Feb 3;22(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07379-7.
8
Impact of Mislabeling on Genomic Selection in Cassava Breeding.标签错误对木薯育种中基因组选择的影响。
Crop Sci. 2018 Jul-Aug;58:1470-1480. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2017.07.0442. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
9
Selective Breeding for Low and High Growth in Honey Bee () Colonies: Initial Results of Two Generations.蜜蜂(意蜂)蜂群低生长率和高生长率的选择性育种:两代的初步结果
Insects. 2020 Dec 4;11(12):864. doi: 10.3390/insects11120864.
10
Substantial Genetic Progress in the International Population Since the Implementation of Genetic Evaluation.自实施遗传评估以来,国际种群取得了显著的遗传进展。
Insects. 2020 Nov 7;11(11):768. doi: 10.3390/insects11110768.