• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Retention of patients in the Get Checked free annual diabetes review programme in New Zealand.

作者信息

Joshy Grace, Lawrenson Ross A, Simmons David

机构信息

University of Auckland, Waikato Clinical School, Waikato Hospital, Private Bag 3200, Hamilton, New Zealand.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2008 Mar 14;121(1270):35-44.

PMID:18364753
Abstract

AIMS

To characterise the retention of patients in the Get Checked free annual diabetes review programme in the Waikato region of New Zealand.

METHODS

Retrospective review of Waikato Primary Health (WPH) registered patients who had at least one Get Checked review between 1 July 2000 and 30 Jun 2006.

RESULTS

10,919 patients (69% Europeans, 18% Maori, 3% Pacific Islanders, and 4% Asian) had an initial review during the 5 years of this programme. In 2005/06, only 6100 (57%) of the estimated 10,600 diabetes patients enrolled with WPH utilised the free check. Younger patients aged <40 years, those of Maori or Asian origin, and those with Type 1 diabetes were less likely to be retained in the programme with regular checks, as indicated by their longer time to second review and lesser likelihood of return for a second or subsequent review.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the programme being fully funded, a significant proportion of patients did not return for a second review within 1.5 years after initial review. The loss of those with Type 1 diabetes and younger patients may reflect their greater contact with secondary care rather than GP services. Excess drop out among ethnic minorities need further investigation and intervention. Use of these data for policy purposes could be significantly biased unless there is a single reliable regional diabetes register based on the National Health Index number including all known patients.

摘要

相似文献

1
Retention of patients in the Get Checked free annual diabetes review programme in New Zealand.
N Z Med J. 2008 Mar 14;121(1270):35-44.
2
Ethnic differences in the prevalence of new and known diabetes mellitus, impaired glucose tolerance, and impaired fasting glucose. Diabetes Heart and Health Survey (DHAH) 2002-2003, Auckland New Zealand.新诊断及已知的糖尿病、糖耐量受损和空腹血糖受损患病率的种族差异。2002 - 2003年糖尿病心脏与健康调查(DHAH),新西兰奥克兰
N Z Med J. 2007 Jun 29;120(1257):U2607.
3
Why don't patients with diagnosed diabetes attend a free 'Get Checked' annual review?为什么已确诊糖尿病的患者不参加免费的“接受检查”年度复查?
J Prim Health Care. 2009 Sep;1(3):222-5.
4
Contribution by primary health nurses and general practitioners to the Diabetes Annual Review (Get Checked) programme in Auckland, New Zealand.新西兰奥克兰的初级保健护士和全科医生对糖尿病年度评估(接受检查)项目的贡献。
N Z Med J. 2013 Aug 16;126(1380):15-26.
5
Ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors and diabetes status for Pacific ethnic groups and Europeans in the Diabetes Heart and Health Survey (DHAH) 2002-2003, Auckland New Zealand.在2002 - 2003年新西兰奥克兰糖尿病心脏与健康调查(DHAH)中,太平洋族裔群体与欧洲人在心血管疾病风险因素和糖尿病状况方面的种族差异。
N Z Med J. 2008 Sep 5;121(1281):28-39.
6
Diabetes detection on the surgical wards in an area with a high prevalence of diabetes.在糖尿病高发地区的外科病房进行糖尿病检测。
N Z Med J. 1993 Apr 28;106(954):156-7.
7
Are there disparities in care in people with diabetes? A review of care provided in general practice.糖尿病患者在医疗护理方面存在差异吗?一项关于全科医疗中所提供护理的综述。
J Prim Health Care. 2009 Sep;1(3):177-83.
8
The impact of patient and practice characteristics on retention in the diabetes annual review programme.患者及医疗实践特征对糖尿病年度复查项目留存率的影响。
J Prim Health Care. 2013 Jun 1;5(2):99-104.
9
Establishing a regional diabetes register and a description of the registered population after one year.建立一个区域糖尿病登记册,并对登记一年后的人群进行描述。
N Z Med J. 2002 Aug 23;115(1160):U146.
10
General practice funding to improve provision of adolescent primary sexual health care in New Zealand: results from an observational intervention.新西兰用于改善青少年初级性健康护理服务的全科医疗资金:一项观察性干预的结果
Sex Health. 2009 Sep;6(3):203-7. doi: 10.1071/SH09012.