Burt S Alexandra, Mikolajewski Amy J
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Aggress Behav. 2008 Jul-Aug;34(4):437-45. doi: 10.1002/ab.20251.
Though initially conceptualized as resulting from peer imitation of child-onset or life-course-persistent youth [Moffitt, 1993], there is mounting evidence from twin studies that adolescent-onset or adolescent-limited antisocial behavior may also be genetically influenced. This study sought to provide preliminary molecular genetic evidence in support of these findings. We further evaluated whether genetic associations varied between behavioral subtypes of ASB (i.e., physical aggression and nonaggressive rule-breaking), given that only the latter has been found to characterize adolescent-onset ASB. The sample consisted of 211 undergraduate men of European-American ancestry. Three polymorphisms with theoretical and/or empirical ties to ASB or related traits (i.e., tryptophan hydroxylase-A218C, 5HT(2A) His452Tyr, and the DAT1 variable nucleotide tandem repeat) were genotyped. Analyses revealed that two of the three polymorphisms (i.e., His452Tyr and DAT1) were associated with adolescent ASB. Moreover, these associations appeared to be specific to the nonaggressive, rule-breaking form of ASB, and did not extend to physical aggression, further supporting ties to adolescent ASB in particular. Such results thus constructively replicate earlier findings of genetic influence on adolescent ASB. They also offer preliminary evidence that the genetic processes underlying aggressive and nonaggressive antisocial behavior may be (at least partially) distinct.
尽管最初认为青少年期或青少年有限期的反社会行为是由儿童期发病或终生持续型青少年的同伴模仿所致[莫菲特,1993],但双胞胎研究越来越多的证据表明,青少年期发病或青少年有限期的反社会行为也可能受遗传影响。本研究旨在提供初步的分子遗传学证据以支持这些发现。鉴于仅发现后者是青少年期发病的反社会行为的特征,我们进一步评估了遗传关联在反社会行为的行为亚型(即身体攻击和非攻击性违规)之间是否存在差异。样本包括211名具有欧美血统的本科男性。对与反社会行为或相关特征具有理论和/或实证联系的三个多态性位点(即色氨酸羟化酶-A218C、5HT(2A) His452Tyr和DAT1可变核苷酸串联重复序列)进行了基因分型。分析显示,三个多态性位点中的两个(即His452Tyr和DAT1)与青少年反社会行为相关。此外,这些关联似乎特定于非攻击性、违规形式的反社会行为,并不延伸至身体攻击,这进一步支持了与青少年反社会行为的特定联系。因此,这些结果建设性地重复了早期关于遗传对青少年反社会行为影响的发现。它们还提供了初步证据,表明攻击性和非攻击性反社会行为背后的遗传过程可能(至少部分)不同。