Boris Neil W, Johnson Carolyn C, Huang Sujuan, Myers Leann, Andrew Kiana, Webber Larry S
Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine in New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2009 Oct;10(4):549-56. doi: 10.1177/1524839907308116. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
This case study examines the comparative effect of no-use school tobacco policies and restricted-use tobacco policies on teacher and student smoking behaviors and attitudes. Data from teachers (n = 1,041) and ninth-grade students (n = 4,763) at 20 schools in five districts in southern Louisiana were available. No significant difference was observed between teacher smoking (11% vs. 13%, p = .42) or student smoking (24.6% vs. 25.2%, p = .75) at no-use versus restricted-use policy schools. The proportion of teachers smoking on campus at no-use or restricted-use schools was not significantly different. Teachers at restricted-use schools were however less concerned about students seeing teachers smoke and less supportive of a no-use policy than teachers at no-use schools. Tobacco use policies are often not promoted, and enforcement of policies impacting teachers is complex. Changing social norms for smoking at high schools through policy promotion and enforcement is understudied.
本案例研究考察了学校禁止吸烟政策和限制吸烟政策对教师及学生吸烟行为和态度的比较影响。研究获取了路易斯安那州南部五个区20所学校的教师（n = 1041）和九年级学生（n = 4763）的数据。在禁止吸烟政策学校和限制吸烟政策学校之间，教师吸烟率（11%对13%，p = 0.42）或学生吸烟率（24.6%对25.2%，p = 0.75）未观察到显著差异。禁止吸烟或限制吸烟学校的教师在校园内吸烟的比例没有显著差异。然而，与禁止吸烟学校的教师相比，限制吸烟学校的教师不太担心学生看到教师吸烟，对禁止吸烟政策的支持度也较低。烟草使用政策往往得不到推广，影响教师的政策执行也很复杂。通过政策推广和执行来改变高中吸烟的社会规范这方面的研究还不足。
