Suppr超能文献

一项比较基于正念减压法和认知行为减压法效果的初步研究。

A pilot study comparing the effects of mindfulness-based and cognitive-behavioral stress reduction.

作者信息

Smith Bruce W, Shelley Brian M, Dalen Jeanne, Wiggins Kathryn, Tooley Erin, Bernard Jennifer

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 85131-1161, USA.

出版信息

J Altern Complement Med. 2008 Apr;14(3):251-8. doi: 10.1089/acm.2007.0641.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this pilot study was to compare the effects of two mind-body interventions: mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and cognitive-behavioral stress reduction (CBSR).

SUBJECTS

Fifty (50) subjects were recruited from the community and took part in MBSR (n = 36) and CBSR (n = 14) courses. Participants self-selected into MBSR or CBSR courses taught at different times. There were no initial differences between the MBSR and CBSR subjects on demographics, including age, gender, education, and income.

INTERVENTION

MBSR was an 8-week course using meditation, gentle yoga, and body scanning exercises to increase mindfulness. CBSR was an 8-week course using cognitive and behavioral techniques to change thinking and reduce distress.

DESIGN

Perceived stress, depression, psychological well-being, neuroticism, binge eating, energy, pain, and mindfulness were assessed before and after each course. Pre-post scores for each intervention were compared by using paired t tests. Pre-post scores across interventions were compared by using a general linear model with repeated measures. SETTINGS/LOCATIONS: Weekly meetings for both courses were held in a large room on a university medical center campus.

RESULTS

MBSR subjects improved on all eight outcomes, with all of the differences being significant. CBSR subjects improved on six of eight outcomes, with significant improvements on well-being, perceived stress, and depression. Multivariate analyses showed that the MBSR subjects had better outcomes across all variables, when compared with the CBSR subjects. Univariate analyses showed that MBSR subjects had better outcomes with regard to mindfulness, energy, pain, and a trend for binge eating.

CONCLUSIONS

While MBSR and CBSR may both be effective in reducing perceived stress and depression, MBSR may be more effective in increasing mindfulness and energy and reducing pain. Future studies should continue to examine the differential effects of cognitive behavioral and mindfulness-based interventions and attempt to explain the reasons for the differences.

摘要

目的

本试点研究的目的是比较两种身心干预措施的效果:基于正念的减压疗法(MBSR)和认知行为减压疗法(CBSR)。

受试者

从社区招募了50名受试者,他们参加了MBSR课程(n = 36)和CBSR课程(n = 14)。参与者自行选择参加在不同时间授课的MBSR或CBSR课程。MBSR组和CBSR组受试者在人口统计学特征(包括年龄、性别、教育程度和收入)上最初没有差异。

干预措施

MBSR是一个为期8周的课程,采用冥想、轻柔瑜伽和身体扫描练习来提高正念。CBSR是一个为期8周的课程,采用认知和行为技术来改变思维并减轻痛苦。

设计

在每个课程前后评估感知压力、抑郁、心理健康、神经质、暴饮暴食、精力、疼痛和正念。使用配对t检验比较每种干预措施的前后得分。通过使用具有重复测量的一般线性模型比较不同干预措施的前后得分。设置/地点:两个课程的每周会议都在大学医学中心校园的一个大房间里举行。

结果

MBSR组受试者在所有八项指标上均有改善,所有差异均具有统计学意义。CBSR组受试者在八项指标中的六项上有改善,在幸福感、感知压力和抑郁方面有显著改善。多变量分析表明,与CBSR组受试者相比,MBSR组受试者在所有变量上都有更好的结果。单变量分析表明,MBSR组受试者在正念、精力、疼痛方面有更好的结果,在暴饮暴食方面有改善趋势。

结论

虽然MBSR和CBSR在减轻感知压力和抑郁方面可能都有效,但MBSR在提高正念和精力以及减轻疼痛方面可能更有效。未来的研究应继续研究认知行为干预和基于正念的干预的差异效应,并试图解释差异的原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验