Smith Bruce W, Shelley Brian M, Dalen Jeanne, Wiggins Kathryn, Tooley Erin, Bernard Jennifer
Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 85131-1161, USA.
J Altern Complement Med. 2008 Apr;14(3):251-8. doi: 10.1089/acm.2007.0641.
The objective of this pilot study was to compare the effects of two mind-body interventions: mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and cognitive-behavioral stress reduction (CBSR).
Fifty (50) subjects were recruited from the community and took part in MBSR (n = 36) and CBSR (n = 14) courses. Participants self-selected into MBSR or CBSR courses taught at different times. There were no initial differences between the MBSR and CBSR subjects on demographics, including age, gender, education, and income.
MBSR was an 8-week course using meditation, gentle yoga, and body scanning exercises to increase mindfulness. CBSR was an 8-week course using cognitive and behavioral techniques to change thinking and reduce distress.
Perceived stress, depression, psychological well-being, neuroticism, binge eating, energy, pain, and mindfulness were assessed before and after each course. Pre-post scores for each intervention were compared by using paired t tests. Pre-post scores across interventions were compared by using a general linear model with repeated measures. SETTINGS/LOCATIONS: Weekly meetings for both courses were held in a large room on a university medical center campus.
MBSR subjects improved on all eight outcomes, with all of the differences being significant. CBSR subjects improved on six of eight outcomes, with significant improvements on well-being, perceived stress, and depression. Multivariate analyses showed that the MBSR subjects had better outcomes across all variables, when compared with the CBSR subjects. Univariate analyses showed that MBSR subjects had better outcomes with regard to mindfulness, energy, pain, and a trend for binge eating.
While MBSR and CBSR may both be effective in reducing perceived stress and depression, MBSR may be more effective in increasing mindfulness and energy and reducing pain. Future studies should continue to examine the differential effects of cognitive behavioral and mindfulness-based interventions and attempt to explain the reasons for the differences.
本试点研究的目的是比较两种身心干预措施的效果:基于正念的减压疗法(MBSR)和认知行为减压疗法(CBSR)。
从社区招募了50名受试者,他们参加了MBSR课程(n = 36)和CBSR课程(n = 14)。参与者自行选择参加在不同时间授课的MBSR或CBSR课程。MBSR组和CBSR组受试者在人口统计学特征(包括年龄、性别、教育程度和收入)上最初没有差异。
MBSR是一个为期8周的课程,采用冥想、轻柔瑜伽和身体扫描练习来提高正念。CBSR是一个为期8周的课程,采用认知和行为技术来改变思维并减轻痛苦。
在每个课程前后评估感知压力、抑郁、心理健康、神经质、暴饮暴食、精力、疼痛和正念。使用配对t检验比较每种干预措施的前后得分。通过使用具有重复测量的一般线性模型比较不同干预措施的前后得分。设置/地点:两个课程的每周会议都在大学医学中心校园的一个大房间里举行。
MBSR组受试者在所有八项指标上均有改善,所有差异均具有统计学意义。CBSR组受试者在八项指标中的六项上有改善,在幸福感、感知压力和抑郁方面有显著改善。多变量分析表明,与CBSR组受试者相比,MBSR组受试者在所有变量上都有更好的结果。单变量分析表明,MBSR组受试者在正念、精力、疼痛方面有更好的结果,在暴饮暴食方面有改善趋势。
虽然MBSR和CBSR在减轻感知压力和抑郁方面可能都有效,但MBSR在提高正念和精力以及减轻疼痛方面可能更有效。未来的研究应继续研究认知行为干预和基于正念的干预的差异效应,并试图解释差异的原因。