Thompson Alastair, Brennan Keith, Cox Angela, Gee Julia, Harcourt Diana, Harris Adrian, Harvie Michelle, Holen Ingunn, Howell Anthony, Nicholson Robert, Steel Michael, Streuli Charles
Department of Surgery and Molecular Oncology, University of Dundee, Ninewells Avenue, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.
Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(2):R26. doi: 10.1186/bcr1983. Epub 2008 Mar 27.
A gap analysis was conducted to determine which areas of breast cancer research, if targeted by researchers and funding bodies, could produce the greatest impact on patients.
Fifty-six Breast Cancer Campaign grant holders and prominent UK breast cancer researchers participated in a gap analysis of current breast cancer research. Before, during and following the meeting, groups in seven key research areas participated in cycles of presentation, literature review and discussion. Summary papers were prepared by each group and collated into this position paper highlighting the research gaps, with recommendations for action.
Gaps were identified in all seven themes. General barriers to progress were lack of financial and practical resources, and poor collaboration between disciplines. Critical gaps in each theme included: (1) genetics (knowledge of genetic changes, their effects and interactions); (2) initiation of breast cancer (how developmental signalling pathways cause ductal elongation and branching at the cellular level and influence stem cell dynamics, and how their disruption initiates tumour formation); (3) progression of breast cancer (deciphering the intracellular and extracellular regulators of early progression, tumour growth, angiogenesis and metastasis); (4) therapies and targets (understanding who develops advanced disease); (5) disease markers (incorporating intelligent trial design into all studies to ensure new treatments are tested in patient groups stratified using biomarkers); (6) prevention (strategies to prevent oestrogen-receptor negative tumours and the long-term effects of chemoprevention for oestrogen-receptor positive tumours); (7) psychosocial aspects of cancer (the use of appropriate psychosocial interventions, and the personal impact of all stages of the disease among patients from a range of ethnic and demographic backgrounds).
Through recommendations to address these gaps with future research, the long-term benefits to patients will include: better estimation of risk in families with breast cancer and strategies to reduce risk; better prediction of drug response and patient prognosis; improved tailoring of treatments to patient subgroups and development of new therapeutic approaches; earlier initiation of treatment; more effective use of resources for screening populations; and an enhanced experience for people with or at risk of breast cancer and their families. The challenge to funding bodies and researchers in all disciplines is to focus on these gaps and to drive advances in knowledge into improvements in patient care.
开展了一项差距分析,以确定乳腺癌研究的哪些领域若得到研究人员和资助机构的关注,可能会对患者产生最大影响。
56名乳腺癌运动资助获得者和英国著名乳腺癌研究人员参与了当前乳腺癌研究的差距分析。在会议前、会议期间和会议之后,七个关键研究领域的小组参与了展示、文献综述和讨论的循环。每个小组编写了总结文件,并整理成这份立场文件,突出研究差距,并提出行动建议。
在所有七个主题中都发现了差距。进展的一般障碍是缺乏资金和实际资源,以及各学科之间合作不佳。每个主题中的关键差距包括:(1)遗传学(基因变化的知识、其影响和相互作用);(2)乳腺癌的起始(发育信号通路如何在细胞水平上导致导管伸长和分支并影响干细胞动态,以及它们的破坏如何引发肿瘤形成);(3)乳腺癌的进展(解读早期进展、肿瘤生长、血管生成和转移的细胞内和细胞外调节因子);(4)治疗方法和靶点(了解谁会发展为晚期疾病);(5)疾病标志物(将智能试验设计纳入所有研究,以确保在使用生物标志物分层的患者群体中测试新治疗方法);(6)预防(预防雌激素受体阴性肿瘤的策略以及雌激素受体阳性肿瘤化学预防的长期影响);(7)癌症的社会心理方面(使用适当的社会心理干预措施,以及该疾病各个阶段对来自不同种族和人口背景患者的个人影响)。
通过针对这些差距进行未来研究的建议,对患者的长期益处将包括:更好地估计乳腺癌家族的风险以及降低风险的策略;更好地预测药物反应和患者预后;改进针对患者亚组的治疗方案定制并开发新的治疗方法;更早开始治疗;更有效地利用资源进行人群筛查;以及改善乳腺癌患者及其家属或有乳腺癌风险人群的体验。对所有学科的资助机构和研究人员而言,挑战在于关注这些差距,并推动知识进步转化为患者护理的改善。