Suppr超能文献

学习在反安慰剂效应和安慰剂效应中的作用。

The role of learning in nocebo and placebo effects.

作者信息

Colloca L, Sigaudo M, Benedetti F

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin Medical School, and National Institute of Neuroscience, Corso Raffaello 30, 10125 Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Pain. 2008 May;136(1-2):211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Mar 26.

Abstract

The nocebo effect consists in delivering verbal suggestions of negative outcomes so that the subject expects clinical worsening. Here we show that nocebo suggestions, in which expectation of pain increase is induced, are capable of producing both hyperalgesic and allodynic responses. By extending previous findings on the placebo effect, we investigated the role of learning in the nocebo effect by means of a conditioning procedure. To do this, verbal suggestions of pain increase were given to healthy volunteers before administration of either tactile or low-intensity painful electrical stimuli. This nocebo procedure was also carried out after a pre-conditioning session in which two different conditioned visual stimuli were associated to either pain or no-pain. Pain perception was assessed by means of a Numerical Rating Scale raging from 0=tactile to 10=maximum imaginable pain. We found that verbal suggestions alone, without prior conditioning, turned tactile stimuli into pain as well as low-intensity painful stimuli into high-intensity pain. A conditioning procedure produced similar effects, without significant differences. Therefore, in contrast to placebo analgesia, whereby a conditioning procedure elicits larger effects compared to verbal suggestions alone, learning seems to be less important in nocebo hyperalgesia. Overall, these findings indicate that, by defining hyperalgesia as an increase in pain sensitivity and allodynia as the perception of pain in response to innocuous stimulation, nocebos can indeed produce both hyperalgesic and allodynic effects. These results also suggest that learning is not important in nocebo hyperalgesia compared to placebo analgesia.

摘要

反安慰剂效应是指给出负面结果的言语暗示,从而使受试者预期病情会恶化。在此我们表明,引发疼痛加剧预期的反安慰剂暗示能够产生痛觉过敏和异常性疼痛反应。通过扩展先前关于安慰剂效应的研究结果,我们借助一种条件作用程序来探究学习在反安慰剂效应中的作用。为此,在对健康志愿者施加触觉或低强度疼痛电刺激之前,先给予他们疼痛加剧的言语暗示。这种反安慰剂程序也在一个预条件作用环节之后进行,在该环节中,将两种不同的条件视觉刺激分别与疼痛或无疼痛联系起来。疼痛感知通过数字评分量表进行评估,范围从0(触觉)到10(可想象的最大疼痛)。我们发现,仅言语暗示(无先前的条件作用)就能将触觉刺激转化为疼痛,以及将低强度疼痛刺激转化为高强度疼痛。一种条件作用程序产生了类似的效果,且无显著差异。因此,与安慰剂镇痛相反,在安慰剂镇痛中,条件作用程序相比仅言语暗示会引发更大的效果,而在反安慰剂痛觉过敏中,学习似乎没那么重要。总体而言,这些发现表明,通过将痛觉过敏定义为疼痛敏感性增加,将异常性疼痛定义为对无害刺激产生的疼痛感知,反安慰剂确实能够产生痛觉过敏和异常性疼痛效应。这些结果还表明,与安慰剂镇痛相比,学习在反安慰剂痛觉过敏中并不重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验