• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

统计学习独立于外部线索塑造疼痛感知和预测。

Statistical learning shapes pain perception and prediction independently of external cues.

机构信息

Computational and Biological Learning Unit, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Applied Computational Psychiatry Lab, Max Planck Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Mental Health Neuroscience Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Elife. 2024 Jul 10;12:RP90634. doi: 10.7554/eLife.90634.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.90634
PMID:38985572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11236420/
Abstract

The placebo and nocebo effects highlight the importance of expectations in modulating pain perception, but in everyday life we don't need an external source of information to form expectations about pain. The brain can learn to predict pain in a more fundamental way, simply by experiencing fluctuating, non-random streams of noxious inputs, and extracting their temporal regularities. This process is called statistical learning. Here, we address a key open question: does statistical learning modulate pain perception? We asked 27 participants to both rate and predict pain intensity levels in sequences of fluctuating heat pain. Using a computational approach, we show that probabilistic expectations and confidence were used to weigh pain perception and prediction. As such, this study goes beyond well-established conditioning paradigms associating non-pain cues with pain outcomes, and shows that statistical learning itself shapes pain experience. This finding opens a new path of research into the brain mechanisms of pain regulation, with relevance to chronic pain where it may be dysfunctional.

摘要

安慰剂和反安慰剂效应突出了期望在调节疼痛感知中的重要性,但在日常生活中,我们不需要外部信息来源来形成对疼痛的期望。大脑可以通过更基本的方式学习预测疼痛,只需简单地经历波动的、非随机的有害输入流,并从中提取其时间规律。这个过程被称为统计学习。在这里,我们解决了一个关键的开放性问题:统计学习是否调节疼痛感知?我们要求 27 名参与者对波动热痛序列中的疼痛强度进行评分和预测。使用一种计算方法,我们表明概率期望和置信度被用于权衡疼痛感知和预测。因此,这项研究超越了将非疼痛线索与疼痛结果相关联的既定条件作用范式,并表明统计学习本身塑造了疼痛体验。这一发现为疼痛调节的大脑机制研究开辟了一条新途径,对于可能功能失调的慢性疼痛具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/e8b151c2001e/elife-90634-sa3-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/4bc6378be5b4/elife-90634-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/7522013f913f/elife-90634-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/8be5dac64296/elife-90634-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/d4181271b064/elife-90634-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/7d20d8f0b6af/elife-90634-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/54cd2066dbfd/elife-90634-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/328a7fbc3295/elife-90634-app1-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/f4d71559b2fe/elife-90634-app1-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/9e04250f1f92/elife-90634-app1-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/e621c3c88dc1/elife-90634-app1-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/8a7ddc91bac3/elife-90634-app1-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/a5189c2a951b/elife-90634-app1-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/e2c668ab5b0c/elife-90634-app1-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/8702389aee5c/elife-90634-app1-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/532d9ded07a5/elife-90634-app1-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/bb8066a0d270/elife-90634-app1-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/15bd3449db6c/elife-90634-app1-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/cc2812734948/elife-90634-app1-fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/f23827e69876/elife-90634-app1-fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/e8b151c2001e/elife-90634-sa3-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/4bc6378be5b4/elife-90634-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/7522013f913f/elife-90634-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/8be5dac64296/elife-90634-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/d4181271b064/elife-90634-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/7d20d8f0b6af/elife-90634-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/54cd2066dbfd/elife-90634-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/328a7fbc3295/elife-90634-app1-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/f4d71559b2fe/elife-90634-app1-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/9e04250f1f92/elife-90634-app1-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/e621c3c88dc1/elife-90634-app1-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/8a7ddc91bac3/elife-90634-app1-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/a5189c2a951b/elife-90634-app1-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/e2c668ab5b0c/elife-90634-app1-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/8702389aee5c/elife-90634-app1-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/532d9ded07a5/elife-90634-app1-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/bb8066a0d270/elife-90634-app1-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/15bd3449db6c/elife-90634-app1-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/cc2812734948/elife-90634-app1-fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/f23827e69876/elife-90634-app1-fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b6/11236420/e8b151c2001e/elife-90634-sa3-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Statistical learning shapes pain perception and prediction independently of external cues.统计学习独立于外部线索塑造疼痛感知和预测。
Elife. 2024 Jul 10;12:RP90634. doi: 10.7554/eLife.90634.
2
Generalization of learned pain modulation depends on explicit learning.习得性疼痛调节的泛化依赖于显性学习。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Mar;184:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
3
Psychological Placebo and Nocebo Effects on Pain Rely on Expectation and Previous Experience.心理安慰剂和反安慰剂效应在疼痛方面依赖于期望和既往经历。
J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):203-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
4
A Neural Mechanism for Nonconscious Activation of Conditioned Placebo and Nocebo Responses.条件性安慰剂和反安慰剂反应非意识激活的神经机制
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Oct;25(10):3903-10. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu275. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
5
Pain reflects the informational value of nociceptive inputs.疼痛反映了伤害性输入的信息价值。
Pain. 2024 Oct 1;165(10):e115-e125. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003254. Epub 2024 May 7.
6
Brainstem Mechanisms of Pain Modulation: A within-Subjects 7T fMRI Study of Placebo Analgesic and Nocebo Hyperalgesic Responses.脑机制的疼痛调制:在 7T fMRI 研究中的安慰剂镇痛和反安慰剂痛觉过敏的反应。
J Neurosci. 2021 Nov 24;41(47):9794-9806. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0806-21.2021. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
7
Confidence of probabilistic predictions modulates the cortical response to pain.概率预测的置信度调节疼痛的皮层反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jan 24;120(4):e2212252120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212252120. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
8
Threat Prediction from Schemas as a Source of Bias in Pain Perception.从模式中预测威胁是疼痛感知产生偏差的一个来源。
J Neurosci. 2020 Feb 12;40(7):1538-1548. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2104-19.2019. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
9
Learning by experience? Visceral pain-related neural and behavioral responses in a classical conditioning paradigm.通过经验学习?经典条件反射范式中与内脏痛相关的神经和行为反应。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Jun;29(6). doi: 10.1111/nmo.13026. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
10
The interplay of exercise, placebo and nocebo effects on experimental pain.运动、安慰剂和反安慰剂效应在实验性疼痛中的相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 3;8(1):14758. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32974-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Expectation generation and its effect on subsequent pain and visual perception.期望的产生及其对后续疼痛和视觉感知的影响。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 May 22;21(5):e1013053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013053. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Expectation generation and its effect on subsequent pain and visual perception.期望的产生及其对后续疼痛和视觉感知的影响。
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 12:2024.10.10.617570. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.10.617570.
3
A computational mechanism of cue-stimulus integration for pain in the brain.大脑疼痛的线索-刺激整合的计算机制。

本文引用的文献

1
Confidence of probabilistic predictions modulates the cortical response to pain.概率预测的置信度调节疼痛的皮层反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jan 24;120(4):e2212252120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212252120. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
2
Contextual inference in learning and memory.语境推理在学习和记忆中的作用。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Jan;27(1):43-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
3
Computational and neural mechanisms of statistical pain learning.统计疼痛学习的计算和神经机制。
Sci Adv. 2024 Sep 13;10(37):eado8230. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ado8230. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
Nat Commun. 2022 Nov 3;13(1):6613. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34283-9.
4
Patients with chronic pain exhibit individually unique cortical signatures of pain encoding.慢性疼痛患者表现出个体独特的疼痛编码皮质特征。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Apr 1;43(5):1676-1693. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25750. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
5
A model for learning based on the joint estimation of stochasticity and volatility.基于随机波动联合估计的学习模型。
Nat Commun. 2021 Nov 15;12(1):6587. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26731-9.
6
Hierarchical models of pain: Inference, information-seeking, and adaptive control.疼痛的层次模型:推理、信息寻求与适应性控制。
Neuroimage. 2020 Nov 15;222:117212. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117212. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
7
The prevalence and importance of statistical learning in human cognition and behavior.统计学习在人类认知与行为中的普遍性及重要性。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2020 Apr;32:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
8
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python.SciPy 1.0:Python 中的科学计算基础算法。
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
9
Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data.计算行为数据建模的 10 个简单规则。
Elife. 2019 Nov 26;8:e49547. doi: 10.7554/eLife.49547.
10
A common probabilistic framework for perceptual and statistical learning.一种用于感知和统计学习的常见概率框架。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019 Oct;58:218-228. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Oct 24.