Suppr超能文献

偶然的健康信息使用与媒体互补性:老年与非老年癌症患者的比较

Incidental health information use and media complementarity: a comparison of senior and non-senior cancer patients.

作者信息

Tian Yan, Robinson James D

机构信息

Department of Communication, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63121, United States.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jun;71(3):340-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Mar 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study compares the health information and media usage patterns of older adults diagnosed with cancer with their younger adult counterparts and is based theoretically in media complementarity theory [Dutta-Bergman MJ. Complementarity in consumption of news types across traditional and new media. J Broadcast Electron 2004;48:41-60; Dutta-Bergman MJ. Interpersonal communication after 9/11 via telephone and Internet: a theory of channel complementarity. New Media Soc 2004;6:659-73] and health information seeking and scanning research [Shim M, Kelly B, Hornik R. Cancer information scanning and seeking behavior is associated with knowledge, lifestyle choices, and screening. J Health Commun 2006;11:157-72].

METHODS

A secondary analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) II data collected by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) is performed to investigate differences in the health information behavior of younger and older adult cancer patients. The sample size was 401, with 260 non-senior cancer patients and 141 senior cancer patients.

RESULTS

Younger adults diagnosed with cancer were more likely to gain information about health incidentally through their use of the Internet and to seek health information for others on the Internet than senior cancer patients. Complementarity of active health information seeking and incidental health information use online was supported with senior cancer patients, while complementarity of incidental health information use between traditional media channels and the Internet was partially confirmed with younger adults.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals similarities and differences in the health information and media usage behavior of younger and older adults diagnosed with cancer. It also provides partial support for media complementarity theory.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The Internet is not a panacea for health information. Health professionals need to provide written instructions to older adult cancer patients because they do not rely on the Internet for information about their illness and/or treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了被诊断患有癌症的老年人与其年轻成年同龄人在健康信息和媒体使用模式方面的差异,并在理论上基于媒体互补理论[杜塔 - 伯格曼MJ。传统媒体和新媒体新闻类型消费中的互补性。《广播与电子媒体杂志》2004年;48:41 - 60;杜塔 - 伯格曼MJ。9·11事件后通过电话和互联网进行的人际传播:渠道互补理论。《新媒体与社会》2004年;6:659 - 73]以及健康信息寻求与扫描研究[沈M、凯利B、霍尼克R。癌症信息扫描与寻求行为与知识、生活方式选择及筛查相关。《健康传播杂志》2006年;11:157 - 72]。

方法

对美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)收集的健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)II数据进行二次分析,以调查年轻和老年成年癌症患者在健康信息行为方面的差异。样本量为401,其中260名非老年癌症患者和141名老年癌症患者。

结果

与老年癌症患者相比,被诊断患有癌症的年轻成年人更有可能通过使用互联网偶然获取健康信息,并在互联网上为他人寻求健康信息。老年癌症患者支持在线积极寻求健康信息与偶然使用健康信息之间的互补性,而年轻成年人部分证实了传统媒体渠道与互联网之间偶然使用健康信息的互补性。

结论

本研究揭示了被诊断患有癌症的年轻和老年成年人在健康信息和媒体使用行为方面的异同。它也为媒体互补理论提供了部分支持。

实践意义

互联网并非获取健康信息的万灵药。健康专业人员需要为老年癌症患者提供书面说明,因为他们不依赖互联网获取有关其疾病和/或治疗的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验