Manrique Mariana, Micewicz Ewa, Kozlowski Pamela A, Wang Shainn-Wei, Aurora Deepti, Wilson Robert L, Ghebremichael Musie, Mazzara Gail, Montefiori David, Carville Angela, Mansfield Keith G, Aldovini Anna
Department of Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2008 Mar;24(3):505-19. doi: 10.1089/aid.2007.0191.
The ability of vaccines to induce immunity both in mucosal and systemic compartments may be required for prevention of HIV infection and AIDS. We compared DNA-MVA vaccination regimens adjuvanted by IL-12 DNA, administered intramuscularly and nasally or only nasally. Most of the vaccinated Rhesus macaques developed mucosal and systemic humoral and cell-mediated SHIV-specific immune responses. Stimulation of mucosal anti-Env IgA responses was limited. After rectal challenge with SHIV 89.6P, all vaccinated and naive animals became infected. However, most of the vaccinated animals showed significant control of viremia and protection from CD4(+) T cell loss and AIDS progression compared to the control animals. The levels of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell virus-specific responses measured on the day of challenge correlated with the level of viremia control observed later during the chronic infection. Postchallenge viremia levels inversely correlated with the preservation of SHIV-specific CD4(+)/IL-2(+) and CD8(+)/TNF-alpha(+) T cells but not with CD4(+)/IFN-gamma(+) T cells measured over time after challenge. We also found that during the early chronic infection SHIV vaccination permitted a more significant preservation of both naive and memory CD4(+) T cells compared to controls. In addition, we observed a more significant and prolonged preservation of memory CD4(+) T cells after SHIV vaccination and challenge than that observed after SIV vaccination and challenge. As the antiviral immunity stimulated by vaccination is present in the memory CD4(+) T cell subpopulations, its more limited targeting by SHIV compared to SIV may explain the better control of X4 tropic SHIV than R5 tropic SIVs by vaccination.
疫苗在黏膜和全身免疫区室诱导免疫的能力对于预防HIV感染和艾滋病可能是必需的。我们比较了用IL-12 DNA佐剂的DNA-MVA疫苗接种方案,该方案通过肌肉内和鼻内给药或仅鼻内给药。大多数接种疫苗的恒河猴产生了黏膜和全身的体液及细胞介导的针对SHIV的特异性免疫反应。对黏膜抗Env IgA反应的刺激有限。在用SHIV 89.6P进行直肠攻击后,所有接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的动物都被感染。然而,与对照动物相比,大多数接种疫苗的动物显示出对病毒血症的显著控制,并免受CD4(+) T细胞损失和艾滋病进展的影响。攻击当天测得的CD4(+)和CD8(+) T细胞病毒特异性反应水平与慢性感染后期观察到的病毒血症控制水平相关。攻击后病毒血症水平与SHIV特异性CD4(+)/IL-2(+)和CD8(+)/TNF-α(+) T细胞的保存呈负相关,但与攻击后随时间测量的CD4(+)/IFN-γ(+) T细胞无关。我们还发现,与对照相比,在慢性感染早期,SHIV疫苗接种能更显著地保存幼稚和记忆CD4(+) T细胞。此外,我们观察到,与SIV疫苗接种和攻击后相比,SHIV疫苗接种和攻击后记忆CD4(+) T细胞的保存更显著且持续时间更长。由于疫苗接种刺激的抗病毒免疫存在于记忆CD4(+) T细胞亚群中,与SIV相比,SHIV对其靶向作用更有限,这可能解释了通过疫苗接种对X4嗜性SHIV的控制优于R5嗜性SIV。
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2004-8
Front Immunol. 2021
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2020-12
Curr Immunol Rev. 2019
Vaccines (Basel). 2014-5-14
Curr Protoc Immunol. 2013-10-1
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2007-2
Trends Immunol. 2006-5
Annu Rev Med. 2005