Bartos Christa E, Fridsma Douglas B, Butler Brian S, Penrod Louis E, Becich Michael J, Crowley Rebecca S
Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Biomed Inform. 2008 Dec;41(6):1041-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
We report on the development of an instrument to measure clinicians' perceptions of their personal power in the workplace in relation to resistance to computerized physician order entry (CPOE). The instrument is based on French and Raven's six bases of social power and uses a semantic differential methodology. A measurement study was conducted to determine the reliability and validity of the survey. The survey was administered online and distributed via a URL by email to 19 physicians, nurses, and health unit coordinators from a university hospital. Acceptable reliability was achieved by removing or moving some semantic differential word pairs used to represent the six power bases (alpha range from 0.76 to 0.89). The Semantic Differential Power Perception (SDPP) survey validity was tested against an already validated instrument and found to be acceptable (correlation range from 0.51 to 0.81). The SDPP survey instrument was determined to be both reliable and valid.
我们报告了一种用于测量临床医生对其在工作场所个人权力的认知（与抵制计算机化医生医嘱录入[CPOE]相关）的工具的开发情况。该工具基于弗伦奇和雷文的六种社会权力基础，并采用语义差异法。进行了一项测量研究以确定该调查的信度和效度。该调查通过在线方式进行，并通过电子邮件将网址分发给一所大学医院的19名医生、护士和健康单元协调员。通过去除或调整一些用于表示六种权力基础的语义差异词对，实现了可接受的信度（α系数范围为0.76至0.89）。语义差异权力认知（SDPP）调查的效度与一种已验证的工具进行了对比测试，结果发现是可接受的（相关系数范围为0.51至0.81）。SDPP调查工具被确定为既可靠又有效。
