Neven Enrico, D'Hooghe Pieter, Bellemans Johan
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery of University Hospitals of Leuven, Belgium.
Arthroscopy. 2008 Apr;24(4):436-40. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.09.013. Epub 2007 Dec 31.
The aim of this study was to identify the anatomic relation between the posterolateral drill hole and the lateral structures of the knee. The length of the posterolateral tunnel and the feasibility of the EndoButton CL (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA) as posterolateral graft fixation device was also evaluated.
An anatomic descriptive study was performed on 24 cadaveric knees. The double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was reconstructed using standard arthroscopic techniques and the EndoButton CL fixation system. The study protocol was as follows: first, an arthroscopy with posterolateral pin placement and drilling of the posterolateral tunnel was performed. Subsequently, the lateral structures were dissected and the distance between the pin and the different anatomic structures was measured. From outside in, the length of the posterolateral tunnel was also measured.
This study shows that there is no increased risk of injuring the lateral collateral ligament during posterolateral tunnel placement in double-bundle ACL reconstruction, when performed through a low anteromedial portal in high flexion. Furthermore, a safe margin was noted between the posterolateral tunnel and the adjacent lateral gastrocnemius and popliteus tendons. The length of the posterolateral tunnel was between 32 and 44 mm (mean, 36.92 mm).
We conclude that the posterolateral tunnel can be created safely in double-bundle ACL reconstruction without additional risk to the surrounding structures. A 15-mm EndoButton CL fixation device is routinely advised as posterolateral graft fixation in order to avoid the risk of over-advancing the device or overdrilling.
This study has shown that there is no risk of iatrogenic lesion to the lateral collateral ligament, lateral gastrocnemius tendon, or popliteus tendon with a posterolateral tunnel drilled through a low anteromedial portal in high flexion.
本研究旨在确定后外侧钻孔与膝关节外侧结构之间的解剖关系。同时评估后外侧隧道的长度以及EndoButton CL(史赛克公司,安多弗,马萨诸塞州)作为后外侧移植物固定装置的可行性。
对24具尸体膝关节进行解剖描述性研究。采用标准关节镜技术和EndoButton CL固定系统重建双束前交叉韧带(ACL)。研究方案如下:首先,进行关节镜检查并在后外侧置入定位针及钻后外侧隧道。随后,解剖外侧结构并测量定位针与不同解剖结构之间的距离。从外向内,也测量后外侧隧道的长度。
本研究表明,在高屈曲位通过低位前内侧入路进行双束ACL重建时,在后外侧隧道置入过程中损伤外侧副韧带的风险并未增加。此外,后外侧隧道与相邻的外侧腓肠肌和腘肌腱之间存在安全 margins。后外侧隧道的长度在32至44毫米之间(平均36.92毫米)。
我们得出结论,可以在双束ACL重建中安全地创建后外侧隧道,而不会对周围结构造成额外风险。常规建议使用15毫米的EndoButton CL固定装置作为后外侧移植物固定,以避免装置推进过度或钻孔过度的风险。
本研究表明,在高屈曲位通过低位前内侧入路钻后外侧隧道时,不会对外侧副韧带、外侧腓肠肌肌腱或腘肌腱造成医源性损伤风险。