• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前交叉韧带重建的“由内而外”与“由外而内”技术:一项前瞻性临床与影像学比较研究

In-out versus out-in technique for ACL reconstruction: a prospective clinical and radiological comparison.

作者信息

Monaco Edoardo, Fabbri Mattia, Redler Andrea, Iorio Raffaele, Conteduca Jacopo, Argento Giuseppe, Ferretti Andrea

机构信息

Orthopaedic Department and "Kirk Kilgour" Sports Injury Center, Sant' Andrea Hospital, "La Sapienza", University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Dec;18(4):335-341. doi: 10.1007/s10195-017-0458-7. Epub 2017 May 8.

DOI:10.1007/s10195-017-0458-7
PMID:28484908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5685978/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have recently shown better restoration of normal knee kinematics and improvement of rotator knee stability after reconstruction with higher femoral tunnel obliquity. The aim of this study is to evaluate tunnel obliquity, length, and posterior wall blowout in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, comparing the transtibial (TT) technique and the out-in (OI) technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty consecutive patients operated on for ACL reconstruction with hamstrings were randomly divided into two groups: group A underwent a TT technique, while group B underwent an OI technique. At mean follow-up of 10 months, clinical results and obliquity, length, and posterior wall blowout of femoral tunnels in sagittal and coronal planes using computed tomography (CT) scan were assessed.

RESULTS

In sagittal plane, femoral tunnel obliquity was 38.6 ± 10.2° in group A and 36.6 ± 11.8° in group B (p = 0.63). In coronal plane, femoral tunnel obliquity was 57.8 ± 5.8° in group A and 35.8 ± 8.2° in group B (p = 0.009). Mean tunnel length was 40.3 ± 1.2 mm in group A and 32.9 ± 2.3 mm in group B (p = 0.01). No cases of posterior wall compromise were observed in any patient of either group. Clinical results were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The OI technique provides greater obliquity of the femoral tunnel in coronal plane, along with satisfactory length of the tunnel and lack of posterior wall compromise.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, prospective study.

摘要

背景

最近的几项研究表明,在采用更高的股骨隧道倾斜度进行重建后,膝关节正常运动学的恢复更好,旋转性膝关节稳定性也有所改善。本研究的目的是评估单束前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中隧道的倾斜度、长度和后壁爆裂情况,比较经胫骨(TT)技术和由外向内(OI)技术。

材料与方法

连续40例接受腘绳肌ACL重建手术的患者被随机分为两组:A组采用TT技术,B组采用OI技术。在平均随访10个月时,评估临床结果以及使用计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描在矢状面和冠状面测量的股骨隧道倾斜度、长度和后壁爆裂情况。

结果

在矢状面,A组股骨隧道倾斜度为38.6±10.2°,B组为36.6±11.8°(p = 0.63)。在冠状面,A组股骨隧道倾斜度为57.8±5.8°,B组为35.8±8.2°(p = 0.009)。A组平均隧道长度为40.3±1.2 mm,B组为32.9±2.3 mm(p = 0.01)。两组患者均未观察到后壁受损情况。两组临床结果无显著差异。

结论

OI技术在冠状面提供了更大的股骨隧道倾斜度,同时隧道长度令人满意且无后壁受损情况。

证据水平

II级,前瞻性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e22/5685978/b191cac099d4/10195_2017_458_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e22/5685978/2bed636f7cfd/10195_2017_458_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e22/5685978/b8395f41b397/10195_2017_458_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e22/5685978/b191cac099d4/10195_2017_458_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e22/5685978/2bed636f7cfd/10195_2017_458_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e22/5685978/b8395f41b397/10195_2017_458_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e22/5685978/b191cac099d4/10195_2017_458_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
In-out versus out-in technique for ACL reconstruction: a prospective clinical and radiological comparison.前交叉韧带重建的“由内而外”与“由外而内”技术:一项前瞻性临床与影像学比较研究
J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Dec;18(4):335-341. doi: 10.1007/s10195-017-0458-7. Epub 2017 May 8.
2
Modified transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of femoral tunnel position and clinical results.解剖单束前交叉韧带重建中改良经胫骨与前内侧入路技术:股骨隧道位置及临床结果比较
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Dec;42(12):2941-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546514551922. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
3
Transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of femoral tunnel length and obliquity.经胫骨与前内上入路钻孔在前交叉韧带重建中的对比:股骨隧道长度和倾斜度的尸体研究。
Arthroscopy. 2010 Mar;26(3):342-50. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.12.006.
4
Comparison of Femoral Tunnel Length and Obliquity Between Transtibial, Anteromedial Portal, and Outside-In Surgical Techniques in Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.单束前交叉韧带重建中经胫骨、前内侧入路和由外向内手术技术的股骨隧道长度及倾斜度比较:一项Meta分析
Arthroscopy. 2016 Jan;32(1):142-50. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
5
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and determination of tunnel size and graft obliquity.前交叉韧带重建及隧道大小和移植物倾斜度的测定
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(3):357-64.
6
Anatomic double-bundle reconstruction techniques result in graft obliquities that closely mimic the native anterior cruciate ligament anatomy.解剖双束重建技术可使移植物的倾斜度与自然前交叉韧带的解剖结构非常相似。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1302-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546513484692. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
7
Does Anteromedial Portal Drilling Improve Footprint Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?前内侧入路钻孔是否能改善前交叉韧带重建中足迹放置情况?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1679-89. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4847-7. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
8
Comparison of tunnel orientation between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-dimensional computed tomography.利用三维计算机断层扫描比较经胫骨隧道和前内侧入路技术行解剖双束前交叉韧带重建的隧道方位。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Feb;29(2):195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Dec 24.
9
Anatomic femoral tunnel placement is difficult by the transtibial technique: comparison of three different femoral tunnel drilling techniques in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.经胫骨技术进行解剖股骨隧道置钉困难:双束前交叉韧带重建中三种不同股骨隧道钻取技术的比较。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Feb;28(2):584-593. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05740-8. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
10
Comparison of femoral tunnel length and obliquity of anatomic versus nonanatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis.解剖与非解剖前交叉韧带重建的股骨隧道长度和倾斜度比较:荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 23;15(3):e0230497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230497. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
The healing effect of the all inside technique is superior to the traditional technique in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.在重建前交叉韧带方面,全内置技术的愈合效果优于传统技术。
Eur J Transl Myol. 2024 Feb 12;34(1):11970. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.11970.
2
Independent Versus Transtibial Drilling in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis With Meta-regression.前交叉韧带重建中独立钻孔与经胫骨钻孔的比较:一项包含Meta回归的Meta分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 12;9(7):23259671211015616. doi: 10.1177/23259671211015616. eCollection 2021 Jul.
3
One-incision versus two-incision techniques for arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Transportal femoral drilling creates more horizontal ACL graft orientation compared to transtibial drilling: A 3D CT imaging study.与经胫骨钻孔相比,经股骨钻孔可使前交叉韧带移植物的方向更水平:一项三维CT成像研究。
Knee. 2016 Jun;23(3):412-9. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
2
Economic Analyses in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Qualitative and Systematic Review.前交叉韧带重建的经济学分析:一项定性与系统综述
Am J Sports Med. 2016 May;44(5):1329-35. doi: 10.1177/0363546515581470. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
3
Advantages and Disadvantages of Transtibial, Anteromedial Portal, and Outside-In Femoral Tunnel Drilling in Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
成人关节镜辅助下前交叉韧带重建的单切口与双切口技术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD010875. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010875.pub2.
经胫骨、前内侧入路及由外向内股骨隧道钻孔在单束前交叉韧带重建中的优缺点:一项系统评价
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul;31(7):1412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
4
Disadvantages and advantages of transtibial technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket.经胫骨技术创建前交叉韧带股骨隧道的优缺点。
J Knee Surg. 2014 Oct;27(5):327-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1382812. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
5
Coverage of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral footprint using 3 different approaches in single-bundle reconstruction: a cadaveric study analyzed by 3-dimensional computed tomography.三种不同入路在单束重建中对前交叉韧带股骨止点的覆盖:三维 CT 分析的尸体研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Oct;41(10):2375-83. doi: 10.1177/0363546513498989. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
6
Comparison of tunnel orientation between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-dimensional computed tomography.利用三维计算机断层扫描比较经胫骨隧道和前内侧入路技术行解剖双束前交叉韧带重建的隧道方位。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Feb;29(2):195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Dec 24.
7
Anatomic femoral tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: use of an accessory medial portal versus traditional transtibial drilling.前交叉韧带重建中解剖股骨隧道钻孔:使用辅助内侧入路与传统经胫骨钻孔的比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jun;40(6):1313-21. doi: 10.1177/0363546512443047. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
8
Clinical outcomes of double- vs single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of randomized control trials.双束与单束前交叉韧带重建的临床疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Feb;23(1):1-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01439.x. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
9
ACL reconstruction: comparison between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques.前交叉韧带重建:经胫骨隧道与前内入路技术的比较。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 May;20(5):896-903. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1645-3. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
10
Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique.经胫骨与前内侧入路扩髓在前交叉韧带重建中的比较:手术技术的解剖学和生物力学评估。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Mar;27(3):380-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.07.018. Epub 2010 Oct 29.