Leff Daniel R, Leong Julian J H, Aggarwal Rajesh, Yang Guang-Zhong, Darzi Ara
Royal Society/Wolfson Medical Image Computing Laboratory, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Ann Surg. 2008 Mar;247(3):540-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815fa42e.
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Variations in technical performance in surgery are known to exist but are poorly understood. Gaining an appreciation of these differences may have implications for technical skills training, assessment, and selection. Investigators attempting to correlate technical skill with visuospatial or perceptual tests have failed to identify surrogate markers of surgical aptitude. Evidence from unrelated fields suggests that studying brain function may advance our understanding of disparate technical performance in surgery.
A literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies assessing both motor skills learning and changes in brain function.
The brain is dynamic and patterns of activation vary with experience and training, a property referred to as "neuroplasticity." Functional neuroimaging studies of complex nonsurgical skills have demonstrated smaller, more refined neuronal networks in experts compared with novices. Novel unrefined performance places a significant burden on generic areas of attention and control such as the anterior cingulate cortex and the prefrontal cortex (PFC). These regions are recruited less as skills are performed with increasing automaticity. Persistent PFC activation has been shown to herald poor bimanual coordination learning in studies involving nonsurgical tasks.
It is suspected that alterations in brain activation foci accompany a transition through phases of surgical skills learning and that those patterns of activation may vary according to technical ability. Validating this hypothesis is challenging because it requires studying brain function in ambulant subjects performing complex motor skills. In a surgical knot-tying study involving over 60 subjects of varying expertise, PFC activation was identified in novices but not in trained surgeons. Further work should aim to determine whether PFC activation attenuates in the context of learning success in surgery.
总结/背景:手术技术操作的差异是已知存在的,但人们对此了解甚少。认识到这些差异可能会对技术技能培训、评估和选拔产生影响。试图将技术技能与视觉空间或感知测试相关联的研究人员未能识别出手术能力的替代指标。来自不相关领域的证据表明,研究脑功能可能会增进我们对手术中不同技术操作表现的理解。
进行文献检索以识别评估运动技能学习和脑功能变化的相关研究。
大脑是动态的,激活模式会随着经验和训练而变化,这种特性被称为“神经可塑性”。对复杂非手术技能的功能性神经成像研究表明,与新手相比,专家的神经网络更小、更精细。新颖的未精炼表现会给注意力和控制的一般区域(如前扣带回皮质和前额叶皮质(PFC))带来重大负担。随着技能执行的自动化程度提高,这些区域的募集会减少。在涉及非手术任务的研究中,持续的PFC激活已被证明预示着双手协调学习不佳。
人们怀疑在手术技能学习阶段的转变过程中,脑激活焦点会发生改变,并且这些激活模式可能会因技术能力而异。验证这一假设具有挑战性,因为它需要研究正在执行复杂运动技能的门诊患者的脑功能。在一项涉及60多名不同专业水平受试者的手术打结研究中,新手被发现有PFC激活,而训练有素的外科医生则没有。进一步的工作应旨在确定在手术学习成功的情况下PFC激活是否会减弱。