Hirsch Russel, Gottliebson William, Crotty Eric, Fleck Robert, Strife Janet
Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, OH 45236, USA.
Congenit Heart Dis. 2006 May;1(3):104-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2006.00016.x.
Pulmonary venous anomalies may be difficult to define in small, critically ill infants using standard echocardiography. In many centers, invasive cardiac catheterization is used if the diagnosis remains inconclusive. We evaluated computed tomography angiography (CTA) as a low-risk alternative to cardiac catheterization in these infants.
All infants <7 kg with congenital heart disease who had undergone CTA in a tertiary care pediatric institution during a 30-month period were included. All had undergone preceding echocardiography, with pulmonary veins defined as normal (group A, n = 40), or abnormal (group B, n = 16). In 6 group B patients, a conclusive diagnosis could not be made by echocardiogram alone. CTAs were analyzed only if contrast density in the left atrium exceeded 200 Houndsfield units. CTA diagnoses (using axial and reformatted 3-dimensional still frame images, and audio video interleaved loops) were compared with preceding echocardiograms (group A), or echocardiography, catheterization angiography, or surgical findings (group B).
Fifty-six patients (mean age 12.4 weeks; range 0-64; mean weight 4.19 kg; range 1.4-7) were included. There were no scan complications. Mean scan duration was 4.6 seconds (range 1.84-11). Scan indications in group A were related mainly to arch (57.5%) and airway issues (17.5%). In group B, most patients had variations of anomalous pulmonary venous return (43.75%), with postsurgical stenosis the second largest group (31.25%). CTA diagnoses were confirmed in all patients. Additional diagnostic confirmation in group B was made at catheterization (1/16) or during surgical intervention (15/16).
Normal and abnormal pulmonary veins could be defined accurately, safely, and rapidly by CTA in all cases. Three-dimensional reformatting provided additional assistance with surgical planning. Echocardiography remains the first-line choice for diagnostic imaging in all patients with pulmonary venous anomalies. However, when echo diagnosis is inconclusive, CTA and not catheterization should be considered the next imaging modality of choice.
对于病情危重的小婴儿,使用标准超声心动图可能难以明确肺静脉异常情况。在许多中心,如果诊断仍不明确,则采用侵入性心脏导管检查。我们评估了计算机断层血管造影(CTA)作为这些婴儿心脏导管检查的低风险替代方法。
纳入在一家三级儿科医疗机构30个月期间接受CTA检查的所有体重<7kg的先天性心脏病婴儿。所有婴儿之前均接受过超声心动图检查,肺静脉被定义为正常(A组,n = 40)或异常(B组,n = 16)。在6例B组患者中,仅通过超声心动图无法做出明确诊断。仅当左心房内造影剂密度超过200亨氏单位时才分析CTA。将CTA诊断结果(使用轴向和重建的三维静态图像以及音频视频交错环)与之前的超声心动图结果(A组)或超声心动图、导管血管造影或手术结果(B组)进行比较。
共纳入56例患者(平均年龄12.4周;范围0 - 64周;平均体重4.19kg;范围1.4 - 7kg)。未发生扫描并发症。平均扫描持续时间为4.6秒(范围1.84 - 11秒)。A组的扫描指征主要与主动脉弓(57.5%)和气道问题(17.5%)有关。在B组中,大多数患者有肺静脉回流异常的变异(43.75%),术后狭窄是第二大组(31.25%)。所有患者的CTA诊断均得到证实。B组中,1例通过导管检查(1/16)或15例在手术干预期间(15/16)得到了额外的诊断确认。
在所有病例中,CTA均可准确、安全且快速地明确肺静脉正常和异常情况。三维重建为手术规划提供了额外帮助。超声心动图仍然是所有肺静脉异常患者诊断成像的一线选择。然而,当超声诊断不明确时,应考虑CTA而非导管检查作为下一个首选成像方式。