Atteslander P
Institut für Sozioökonomie, Universität Augsburg.
Offentl Gesundheitswes. 1991 Aug-Sep;53(8-9):365-72.
The question as to whether work is responsible for a person's sickness is as old as the industrial working system and it has to be raised again and again, for despite the receding importance of purely gainful employment the well-being and health status of workers and often also of their relatives are determined by work. Purely medical data will not suffice to consider this problem, since the overall social conditions must be taken into consideration. Illness or health also become manifest as social behavioural patterns and must be studied as such. It is not work that makes a person sick, but rather the social environment in which he lives and works. The article shows that the conventional medical concepts of disease are often in need of being complemented by a social dimension. This becomes particularly evident by the fact that the undoubtedly grand successes of medicine based on natural sciences yield an increasing fund of knowledge confronted by an insufficiently developed system of social orientation. In this regard the system of lay knowledge which has always been characterised by knowledge oriented on the lines of action, is growing increasingly important. Effective health prevention in public health points towards the need for an increasingly intensified cooperation between the medical profession and the lay system.
工作是否是导致一个人生病的原因这一问题与工业工作系统一样古老,而且必须反复提出,因为尽管纯粹有报酬的就业的重要性在下降,但工人及其亲属的幸福和健康状况往往仍由工作决定。仅靠医学数据不足以考虑这个问题,因为必须考虑整体社会状况。疾病或健康也表现为社会行为模式,必须以此进行研究。使人生病的不是工作,而是他生活和工作的社会环境。文章表明,传统的疾病医学概念往往需要从社会层面加以补充。这一点尤其明显,因为基于自然科学的医学取得了无疑巨大的成功,产生了越来越多的知识,但社会导向系统却不够完善。在这方面,一直以行动导向的知识为特征的外行知识体系变得越来越重要。公共卫生领域有效的健康预防表明,医疗行业和外行体系之间需要加强合作。