Turkyilmaz Ilser, Aksoy Utku, McGlumphy Edwin A
Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43218-2357, USA.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008 Dec;10(4):231-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00084.x. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
The primary stability of dental implants associated with resistance to micromotion during healing is affected by surgical technique and implant design, which are important especially in the soft bone, where implant failures are more likely.
This study was designed to compare the parameters associated with implant insertion using two different methods of enhancing implant primary stability and to identify any relationship between these parameters at implant insertion.
A total of 60 implants were placed in the maxillary posterior regions of 22 patients. The bone densities at the implant sites were recorded using a computerized tomography machine in Hounsfield unit (HU). The maximum insertion torque data were recorded with the Osseocare (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) equipment, while resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements were taken using an Osstell (Integration Diagnostics AB, Göteborg, Sweden) machine at implant surgery. Comparisons including HU, Ncm, and implant stability quotient were made between two control groups (C1 and C2), and corresponding four test groups (T1-T4) using thinner drills to enhance primary implant stability.
Two implants were lost, meaning an overall implant survival rate of 96.6% after 3 +/- 1 years. When compared to control groups, significantly higher mean maximum insertion torque and RFA values were found for corresponding test groups. In addition, strong correlations were observed between the bone density and insertion torque, and implant stability values at implant placement.
The results of this study suggest that using thinner drills for implant placement in the maxillary posterior region where bone quality is poor may improve the primary implant stability, which helps clinicians to obtain higher implant survival rates.
牙种植体在愈合过程中的初始稳定性与抵抗微动的能力有关,这受到手术技术和种植体设计的影响,在骨质较软的部位尤为重要,因为在这些部位种植体更易失败。
本研究旨在比较使用两种不同增强种植体初始稳定性方法时与种植体植入相关的参数,并确定植入时这些参数之间的关系。
在22例患者的上颌后部区域共植入60枚种植体。使用计算机断层扫描机以亨氏单位(HU)记录种植体部位的骨密度。使用Osseocare(诺贝尔生物保健公司,瑞典哥德堡)设备记录最大植入扭矩数据,同时在种植手术时使用Osstell(整合诊断公司,瑞典哥德堡)机器进行共振频率分析(RFA)测量。对两个对照组(C1和C2)以及使用更细钻头以增强种植体初始稳定性的相应四个试验组(T1 - T4)进行包括HU、Ncm和种植体稳定性商数的比较。
有2枚种植体丢失,意味着在3±1年后总体种植体存活率为96.6%。与对照组相比,相应试验组的平均最大植入扭矩和RFA值显著更高。此外,在种植体植入时观察到骨密度与植入扭矩以及种植体稳定性值之间存在强相关性。
本研究结果表明,在骨质较差的上颌后部区域使用更细的钻头进行种植体植入可能会提高种植体的初始稳定性,这有助于临床医生获得更高的种植体存活率。