Chandler Clare I R, Jones Caroline, Boniface Gloria, Juma Kaseem, Reyburn Hugh, Whitty Christopher J M
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK.
Malar J. 2008 Apr 2;7:53. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-53.
Malaria over-diagnosis in Africa is widespread and costly both financially and in terms of morbidity and mortality from missed diagnoses. An understanding of the reasons behind malaria over-diagnosis is urgently needed to inform strategies for better targeting of antimalarials.
In an ethnographic study of clinical practice in two hospitals in Tanzania, 2,082 patient consultations with 34 clinicians were observed over a period of three months at each hospital. All clinicians were also interviewed individually as well as being observed during routine working activities with colleagues. Interviews with five tutors and 10 clinical officer students at a nearby clinical officer training college were subsequently conducted.
Four, primarily social, spheres of influence on malaria over-diagnosis were identified. Firstly, the influence of initial training within a context where the importance of malaria is strongly promoted. Secondly, the influence of peers, conforming to perceived expectations from colleagues. Thirdly, pressure to conform with perceived patient preferences. Lastly, quality of diagnostic support, involving resource management, motivation and supervision. Rather than following national guidelines for the diagnosis of febrile illness, clinician behaviour appeared to follow 'mindlines': shared rationales constructed from these different spheres of influence. Three mindlines were identified in this setting: malaria is easier to diagnose than alternative diseases; malaria is a more acceptable diagnosis; and missing malaria is indefensible. These mindlines were apparent during the training stages as well as throughout clinical careers.
Clinicians were found to follow mindlines as well as or rather than guidelines, which incorporated multiple social influences operating in the immediate and the wider context of decision making. Interventions to move mindlines closer to guidelines need to take the variety of social influences into account.
非洲疟疾过度诊断现象普遍,在经济以及漏诊导致的发病率和死亡率方面代价高昂。迫切需要了解疟疾过度诊断背后的原因,以便为更好地靶向使用抗疟药物的策略提供依据。
在坦桑尼亚两家医院进行的一项关于临床实践的人种学研究中,在每家医院为期三个月的时间里观察了34名临床医生的2082次患者会诊。所有临床医生还接受了单独访谈,并在与同事的日常工作活动中接受观察。随后对附近一所临床医生培训学院的五名导师和十名临床医生学生进行了访谈。
确定了对疟疾过度诊断产生影响的四个主要社会领域。首先,在大力宣传疟疾重要性的背景下初始培训的影响。其次,同行的影响,即符合同事的预期观念。第三,符合患者预期偏好的压力。最后,诊断支持的质量,包括资源管理、积极性和监督。临床医生的行为似乎遵循“思维定式”,而非遵循国家关于发热性疾病诊断的指南,这些思维定式是由这些不同影响领域构建的共同基本原理。在这种情况下确定了三种思维定式:疟疾比其他疾病更容易诊断;疟疾是更可接受的诊断;漏诊疟疾是不可原谅的。这些思维定式在培训阶段以及整个临床职业生涯中都很明显。
发现临床医生遵循思维定式而非指南,这些思维定式包含了在决策的直接和更广泛背景中起作用的多种社会影响。促使思维定式更接近指南的干预措施需要考虑到各种社会影响。