Thönes Nadja, Herreiner Anna, Schädlich Lysann, Piuko Konrad, Müller Martin
Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Forschungsschwerpunkt Angewandte Tumorvirologie, Im Neuenheimer Feld 242, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
J Virol. 2008 Jun;82(11):5472-85. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02482-07. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
Capsomeres are considered to be an alternative to viruslike particle (VLP)-based vaccines as they can be produced in prokaryotic expression systems. So far, no detailed side-by-side comparison of VLPs and capsomeres has been performed. In the present study, we immunized mice with insect cell-derived human papillomavirus type 16 VLPs and capsomeres. VLPs induced consistently higher antibody titers than capsomeres but the two forms induced similar CD8 T-cell responses after subcutaneous, intranasal, and oral immunization, and at least 20 to 40 times more L1 in the form of capsomeres than in the form of VLPs was needed to achieve comparable antibody responses. These results were confirmed by DNA immunization. The lower immunogenicity of capsomeres was independent of the isotype switch, as it was also observed for the early immunoglobulin M responses. Although there were differences in the display of surface epitopes between the L1 particles, these did not contribute significantly to the differences in the immune responses. capsomeres were less immunogenic than VLPs in Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-deficient mice, suggesting that the lower immunogenicity is not due to a failure of capsomeres to trigger TLR4. We observed better correlation between antibody results from enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and neutralization assays for sera from VLP-immunized mice than for sera from capsomere-immunized mice, suggesting qualitative differences between VLPs and capsomeres. We also showed that the lower immunogenicity of capsomeres could be compensated by the use of an adjuvant system containing MPL. Taken together, these results suggest that, presumably because of the lower degree of complexity of the antigen organization, capsomeres are significantly less immunogenic than VLPs with respect to the humoral immune response and that this characteristic should be considered in the design of putative capsomere-based prophylactic vaccines.
衣壳粒被认为是基于病毒样颗粒(VLP)的疫苗的一种替代物,因为它们可以在原核表达系统中产生。到目前为止,尚未对VLP和衣壳粒进行详细的并列比较。在本研究中,我们用昆虫细胞衍生的16型人乳头瘤病毒VLP和衣壳粒免疫小鼠。VLP诱导的抗体滴度始终高于衣壳粒,但在皮下、鼻内和口服免疫后,这两种形式诱导的CD8 T细胞反应相似,并且需要至少20至40倍于VLP形式的衣壳粒中的L1才能产生相当的抗体反应。这些结果通过DNA免疫得到证实。衣壳粒较低的免疫原性与同种型转换无关,因为在早期免疫球蛋白M反应中也观察到了这种情况。尽管L1颗粒之间表面表位的展示存在差异,但这些差异对免疫反应的差异没有显著贡献。在Toll样受体4(TLR4)缺陷小鼠中,衣壳粒的免疫原性低于VLP,这表明较低的免疫原性不是由于衣壳粒未能触发TLR4。我们观察到,对于VLP免疫小鼠的血清,酶联免疫吸附测定和中和测定的抗体结果之间的相关性优于衣壳粒免疫小鼠的血清,这表明VLP和衣壳粒之间存在质量差异。我们还表明,使用含有MPL的佐剂系统可以补偿衣壳粒较低的免疫原性。综上所述,这些结果表明,大概是由于抗原组织的复杂程度较低,衣壳粒在体液免疫反应方面的免疫原性明显低于VLP,并且在设计基于衣壳粒的预防性疫苗时应考虑这一特性。