Pedrosa-Domellöf F, Soukup T, Thornell L E
Department of Anatomy, University of Umeå, Sweden.
Histochemistry. 1991;96(4):327-38. doi: 10.1007/BF00271354.
The expression of myosin heavy chain isoforms in muscle spindle fibres has been the subject of a number of immunocytochemical studies, some of them with discordant results. In order to assess whether these discrepancies are due to differences in the specificity and sensitivity of the antibodies used, we have compared the reactivity of rat muscle spindle fibres to two pairs of antibodies presumed to be directed against slow tonic (ALD 19 and ALD 58) and neonatal (NN5) and neonatal/fast (MF30) myosin heavy chains. Adult, developing and neonatally de-efferented muscle spindles from the rat hind limb muscles were studied in serial cross-sections processed for the peroxidase-antiperoxidase method. Important differences in the staining profiles of intrafusal fibres were noted when ALD 19 and ALD 58 were compared. ALD 19 stained the muscle spindle precursors from the seventeenth day in utero, whereas ALD 58 only did so by the twentieth day of gestation. In adult spindles ALD 19 stained the nuclear bag1 fibres along their entire length, whereas ALD 58 did not stain these fibres towards their ends. ALD 19 stained the nuclear bag2 fibres along the A, B and inner C region, but ALD 58 stained these fibres only in the A and the inner B regions. ALD 19 stained some nuclear chain fibres along a short equatorial segment, whereas ALD 58 did not stain the nuclear chain fibres at all. NN5 stained the nascent nuclear bag1 and chain fibre precursors at earlier stages of development than MF30. Clear differential staining between primary and secondary generation of both extra- and intrafusal myotubes was seen with NN5, whereas MF30 stained all myotubes alike. However, in postnatal spindles, MF30 was a very good negative marker of nuclear bag1 fibres. The staining profile of the adult fibres with NN5 and MF30 was rather similar. The staining pattern of neonatally de-efferented bag fibres obtained with ALD 19 and ALD 58 was practically identical and it differed from that of control spindles, confirming that motor innervation participates in the regulation of the expression of slow tonic MHC along the length of the nuclear bag2 fibres, as we have previously shown with ALD 19. The distinct staining patterns obtained with ALD 19 versus ALD 58 and with NN5 versus MF30 reflect differences in antibody sensitivity and specificity. These differences account, in part, for the discrepancies in the results of previous studies on muscle spindles, published by Kucera and Walro using ALD 58 and MF30, and by us using ALD 19 and NN5.
肌梭纤维中肌球蛋白重链亚型的表达一直是多项免疫细胞化学研究的主题,其中一些研究结果并不一致。为了评估这些差异是否是由于所用抗体的特异性和敏感性不同所致,我们比较了大鼠肌梭纤维对两对假定针对慢张力型(ALD 19和ALD 58)、新生型(NN5)和新生/快肌型(MF30)肌球蛋白重链的抗体的反应性。对来自大鼠后肢肌肉的成年、发育中和新生去传入神经的肌梭进行连续横切片研究,采用过氧化物酶-抗过氧化物酶法处理。比较ALD 19和ALD 58时,注意到梭内纤维的染色模式存在重要差异。ALD 19从子宫内第17天开始对肌梭前体进行染色,而ALD 58直到妊娠第20天才开始染色。在成年肌梭中,ALD 19沿核袋1纤维的全长进行染色,而ALD 58在核袋1纤维的末端不染色。ALD 19沿核袋2纤维的A、B和内侧C区域进行染色,但ALD 58仅在A和内侧B区域对这些纤维进行染色。ALD 19沿赤道短节段对一些核链纤维进行染色,而ALD 58根本不染色核链纤维。与MF30相比,NN5在发育早期对新生的核袋1和链纤维前体进行染色。使用NN5可以清楚地看到梭外和梭内肌管的第一代和第二代之间存在差异染色,而MF30对所有肌管的染色相似。然而,在出生后的肌梭中,MF30是核袋1纤维的一个很好的阴性标记。成年纤维用NN5和MF30染色的模式相当相似。新生去传入神经的核袋纤维用ALD 19和ALD 58获得的染色模式几乎相同,并且与对照肌梭的染色模式不同,这证实了运动神经支配参与了核袋2纤维全长上慢张力型MHC表达的调节,正如我们之前用ALD 19所表明的那样。用ALD 19与ALD 58以及NN5与MF30获得的不同染色模式反映了抗体敏感性和特异性的差异。这些差异部分解释了Kucera和Walro使用ALD 58和MF30以及我们使用ALD 19和NN5发表的先前关于肌梭研究结果中的差异。