Greenberg Caprice C, Schneider Eric C, Lipsitz Stuart R, Ko Clifford Y, Malin Jennifer L, Epstein Arnold M, Weeks Jane C, Kahn Katherine L
Center for Surgery and Public Health, Division of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Apr;206(4):605-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.11.017. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
The use of postmastectomy reconstruction varies with socioeconomic status, but the etiology of these variations is not understood. We investigated whether these differences reflect variations in the rate or qualitative aspects of the provider's discussion of reconstruction as an option.
Data were collected through chart review and patient survey for stages I to III breast cancer patients during the National Initiative on Cancer Care Quality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of reconstruction and discussion of reconstruction as an option. Predictors of not receiving reconstruction despite a documented discussion were also determined.
There were 253 of 626 patients who received reconstruction (40.4%). Younger, more educated Caucasian women who were not overweight or receiving postmastectomy radiation were more likely to receive reconstruction. Patients who were younger, more educated, and not receiving postmastectomy radiation were more likely to have a documented discussion of reconstruction. If a discussion was documented, patients who were older, Hispanic, not born in the US, and received postmastectomy radiation were less likely to receive reconstruction. The greatest predictor of reconstruction was medical record documentation of a discussion about reconstruction.
We observed disparities in the likelihood of reconstruction that were at least partially explained by differences in the likelihood that reconstruction was discussed. But there were also differences in the likelihood of reconstruction based on age, race, and radiation once discussions occurred. Efforts to increase and improve discussions about reconstruction may decrease disparities for this procedure.
乳房切除术后重建的使用情况因社会经济地位而异,但其差异的病因尚不清楚。我们调查了这些差异是否反映了医疗服务提供者在讨论重建作为一种选择时的频率或质量方面的差异。
在全国癌症护理质量倡议期间,通过病历审查和患者调查收集了I至III期乳腺癌患者的数据。多变量逻辑回归用于确定重建的预测因素以及将重建作为一种选择进行讨论的预测因素。还确定了尽管有记录的讨论但仍未接受重建的预测因素。
626例患者中有253例接受了重建(40.4%)。年龄较轻、受教育程度较高、非超重且未接受乳房切除术后放疗的白人女性更有可能接受重建。年龄较轻、受教育程度较高且未接受乳房切除术后放疗的患者更有可能有关于重建的记录讨论。如果有记录的讨论,年龄较大、西班牙裔、非美国出生且接受乳房切除术后放疗的患者接受重建的可能性较小。重建的最大预测因素是病历中关于重建讨论的记录。
我们观察到重建可能性的差异,至少部分可以通过讨论重建可能性的差异来解释。但在讨论发生后,基于年龄、种族和放疗的重建可能性也存在差异。增加和改善关于重建讨论的努力可能会减少该手术的差异。