Demmer Ryan T, Jacobs David R, Desvarieux Moïse
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jul;31(7):1373-9. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0026. Epub 2008 Apr 4.
Type 2 diabetes and periodontal disease are known to be associated, but the temporality of this relationship has not been firmly established. We investigated whether baseline periodontal disease independently predicts incident diabetes over two decades of follow-up.
A total of 9,296 nondiabetic male and female National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I) participants aged 25-74 years who completed a baseline dental examination (1971-1976) and had at least one follow-up evaluation (1982-1992) were studied. We defined six categories of baseline periodontal disease using the periodontal index. Of 7,168 dentate participants, 47% had periodontal index = 0 (periodontally healthy); the remaining were classified into periodontal index quintiles. Incident diabetes was defined by 1) death certificate (ICD-9 code 250), 2) self-report of diabetes requiring pharmacological treatment, or 3) health care facility stay with diabetes discharge code. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed incident diabetes odds across increasing levels of periodontal index in comparison with periodontally healthy participants.
The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for incident diabetes in periodontal index categories 1 and 2 were not elevated, whereas the ORs in periodontal index categories 3 through 5 were 2.26 (95% CI 1.56-3.27), 1.71 (1.0-2.69), and 1.50 (0.99-2.27), respectively. The OR in edentulous participants was 1.30 (1.00-1.70). Dentate participants with advanced tooth loss had an OR of 1.70 (P < 0.05) relative to those with minimal tooth loss.
Baseline periodontal disease is an independent predictor of incident diabetes in the nationally representative sample of NHANES I.
2型糖尿病与牙周病之间的关联已为人所知,但这种关系的时间先后顺序尚未完全确立。我们调查了在长达二十年的随访中,基线牙周病是否能独立预测新发糖尿病。
对9296名年龄在25至74岁之间、完成了基线牙科检查(1971 - 1976年)且至少有一次随访评估(1982 - 1992年)的非糖尿病男性和女性国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES I)参与者进行了研究。我们使用牙周指数定义了六类基线牙周病。在7168名有牙参与者中,47%的牙周指数 = 0(牙周健康);其余参与者被分为牙周指数五分位数组。新发糖尿病的定义为:1)死亡证明(国际疾病分类第九版代码250),2)自述需要药物治疗的糖尿病,或3)因糖尿病出院代码而入住医疗机构。多变量逻辑回归模型评估了与牙周健康参与者相比,牙周指数水平升高时新发糖尿病的几率。
牙周指数类别1和2中新发糖尿病的校正比值比(OR)未升高,而牙周指数类别3至5中的OR分别为2.26(95%可信区间1.56 - 3.27)、1.71(1.0 - 2.69)和1.50(0.99 - 2.27)。无牙参与者的OR为1.30(1.00 - 1.70)。牙齿大量缺失的有牙参与者相对于牙齿少量缺失的参与者,OR为1.70(P < 0.05)。
在具有全国代表性的NHANES I样本中,基线牙周病是新发糖尿病的独立预测因素。