Alvarez-Dardet Carlos
Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, España.
Gac Sanit. 2008 Apr;22 Suppl 1:8-13. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(08)76069-2.
Epidemiology already plays a substantial role in the definition of public and corporate policies in Spain as well as in other developed countries. The World Health Organization reinforced the position of epidemiology by enshrining the notion of social health determinants and, as a result, the connection between health and social constructs has become more visible. However, the use of epidemiology is usually restricted to the development and evaluation of policies originating in health bureaucracies with health improvement as the only public objective; these are called direct health policies. This view is somewhat reductionistic insofar as health gains and losses occur mainly due to policies outside the health sector. To expand the role of epidemiology as a tool to shape policies, we need a view of exposures and effects beyond healthcare and the biological and behavioral risk factors proposed by medical paternalism. Also required are an attitude that is more participative than prescriptive and the development of more health impact assessments. In addition, the health effects of the decisions taken by politically-empowered institutions should be included in the epidemiologist's tool kit. In other words, a political epidemiology should be constructed. For this endeavor, which may be crucial to attain the public health required, public health practitioners should be more visible and credible, have greater independence from political power, provide information directly to the public and other stake holders (greater transparency), and further develop the professionalization of public health (greater competence) by working increasingly in networks of professionals rather than in bureaucratic pyramids.
在西班牙以及其他发达国家,流行病学在公共政策和企业政策的制定中已经发挥了重要作用。世界卫生组织通过确立社会健康决定因素的概念,强化了流行病学的地位,因此,健康与社会结构之间的联系变得更加明显。然而,流行病学的应用通常局限于源自卫生官僚机构、以改善健康为唯一公共目标的政策的制定和评估;这些政策被称为直接健康政策。这种观点有点过于简化,因为健康的得失主要是由卫生部门以外的政策导致的。为了扩大流行病学作为政策制定工具的作用,我们需要一种超越医疗保健以及医学家长主义所提出的生物和行为风险因素的暴露和影响观。还需要一种更具参与性而非指令性的态度,以及开展更多的健康影响评估。此外,有政治权力的机构所做决策的健康影响应纳入流行病学家的工具包。换句话说,应该构建一种政治流行病学。对于这项可能对实现所需的公共卫生至关重要的工作,公共卫生从业者应该更加引人注目且可信,在政治权力方面拥有更大的独立性,直接向公众和其他利益相关者提供信息(更高的透明度),并通过越来越多地在专业人员网络而非官僚层级中工作,进一步推动公共卫生的专业化(更高的能力)。