Livaja Maren, Zeidler Dana, von Rad Uta, Durner Jörg
Institute of Floriculture and Tree Sciences, Leibniz University of Hannover, 30419 Hannover, Germany.
Immunobiology. 2008;213(3-4):161-71. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2007.10.004. Epub 2007 Nov 28.
Many plant-pathogen interactions are controlled by specific interactions between pathogen avirulence (avr) gene loci and the corresponding plant resistance R locus (gene-for-gene-hypothesis). Very often, this type of interaction culminates in a hypersensitive reaction (HR). However, recently pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) such as flagellin or lipopolysaccharides (LPS) that are common to all bacteria have been shown to act as general elicitors of basal or innate immune responses in several plant species. Here, we summarize the genetic programs in Arabidopsis thaliana behind the LPS-induced basal response and the HR induced by harpin, respectively. Using Agilent Arabidopsis cDNA microarrays consisting of approximately 15,000 oligomers, changes in transcript accumulation of treated cells were monitored over a period of 24h after elicitor treatment. Analysis of the array data revealed significant responses to LPS (309 genes), harpin (951 genes) or both (313 genes). Concentrating our analysis on the genes encoding transcription factors, defence genes, cell wall biogenesis-related genes and signal transduction components we monitored interesting parallels, but also remarkably different expression patterns. Harpin and LPS induced an overlapping set of genes involved in cell wall biogenesis, cellular communication and signalling. The pattern of induced genes associated with cell rescue and general stress responses such as small heat-shock proteins was highly similar. In contrast, there is a striking difference regarding some of the most prominent, central components of plant defence such as WRKY transcription factors and oxidative burst-associated genes like NADPH oxidases, whose expression became apparent only after treatment with harpin. While both harpin and LPS can stimulate plant immunity in Arabidopsis, the PAMP LPS induces much more subtle host reactions at the transcriptome scale. The defence machinery induced by harpin resembles the known HR-type host responses leading to cell death after treatment with this elicitor. LPS is a weak inducer of basal resistance and induces a different pattern of genes. Strikingly the biggest overlap (40) of responding genes was found between the early harpin response (30min) and the late LPS response (24h).
许多植物与病原体的相互作用是由病原体无毒(avr)基因座与相应的植物抗性R基因座之间的特异性相互作用所控制(基因对基因假说)。这种相互作用常常以过敏反应(HR)告终。然而,最近发现,诸如鞭毛蛋白或脂多糖(LPS)等所有细菌共有的病原体相关分子模式(PAMP),在几种植物物种中可作为基础免疫或先天免疫反应的一般激发子。在此,我们分别总结了拟南芥中LPS诱导的基础反应和harpin诱导的过敏反应背后的遗传程序。使用由约15,000个寡聚物组成的安捷伦拟南芥cDNA微阵列,在激发子处理后的24小时内监测处理细胞中转录本积累的变化。阵列数据分析显示,对LPS(309个基因)、harpin(951个基因)或两者(313个基因)有显著反应。我们将分析集中在编码转录因子、防御基因、细胞壁生物合成相关基因和信号转导成分的基因上,监测到了有趣的相似之处,但也有明显不同的表达模式。harpin和LPS诱导了一组重叠的参与细胞壁生物合成、细胞通讯和信号传导的基因。与细胞拯救和一般应激反应相关的诱导基因模式,如小热休克蛋白,高度相似。相比之下,在植物防御的一些最突出、核心的成分方面存在显著差异,如WRKY转录因子和与氧化爆发相关的基因(如NADPH氧化酶),其表达仅在harpin处理后才明显。虽然harpin和LPS都能刺激拟南芥中的植物免疫,但PAMP LPS在转录组水平上诱导的宿主反应要微妙得多。harpin诱导的防御机制类似于已知的过敏反应型宿主反应,在用这种激发子处理后导致细胞死亡。LPS是基础抗性的弱诱导剂,并诱导不同的基因模式。令人惊讶的是,在早期harpin反应(30分钟)和晚期LPS反应(24小时)之间发现了最大的响应基因重叠(40个)。