• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于因果效应模型分析序贯随机试验以制定现实的个体化治疗规则。

Analyzing sequentially randomized trials based on causal effect models for realistic individualized treatment rules.

作者信息

Bembom Oliver, van der Laan Mark J

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2008 Aug 30;27(19):3689-716. doi: 10.1002/sim.3268.

DOI:10.1002/sim.3268
PMID:18407580
Abstract

In this paper, we argue that causal effect models for realistic individualized treatment rules represent an attractive tool for analyzing sequentially randomized trials. Unlike a number of methods proposed previously, this approach does not rely on the assumption that intermediate outcomes are discrete or that models for the distributions of these intermediate outcomes given the observed past are correctly specified. In addition, it generalizes the methodology for performing pairwise comparisons between individualized treatment rules by allowing the user to posit a marginal structural model for all candidate treatment rules simultaneously. This is particularly useful if the number of such rules is large, in which case an approach based on individual pairwise comparisons would be likely to suffer from too much sampling variability to provide an informative answer. In addition, such causal effect models represent an interesting alternative to methods previously proposed for selecting an optimal individualized treatment rule in that they immediately give the user a sense of how the optimal outcome is estimated to change in the neighborhood of the identified optimum. We discuss an inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted (IPTW) estimator for these causal effect models, which is straightforward to implement using standard statistical software, and develop an approach for constructing valid asymptotic confidence intervals based on the influence curve of this estimator. The methodology is illustrated in two simulation studies that are intended to mimic an HIV/AIDS trial.

摘要

在本文中,我们认为用于现实个体化治疗规则的因果效应模型是分析序贯随机试验的一个有吸引力的工具。与先前提出的许多方法不同,这种方法不依赖于中间结果是离散的假设,也不依赖于给定观察到的过去情况时这些中间结果分布模型被正确设定的假设。此外,它通过允许用户同时为所有候选治疗规则设定一个边际结构模型,推广了在个体化治疗规则之间进行成对比较的方法。如果此类规则的数量很大,这一点尤其有用,在这种情况下,基于逐个成对比较的方法可能会因抽样变异性过大而无法提供有价值的答案。此外,此类因果效应模型是先前提出的用于选择最优个体化治疗规则的方法的一个有趣替代方案,因为它们能让用户立刻了解到在已确定的最优值附近最优结果估计值是如何变化的。我们讨论了这些因果效应模型的逆概率治疗权重(IPTW)估计器,它使用标准统计软件很容易实现,并基于该估计器的影响曲线开发了一种构建有效渐近置信区间的方法。该方法在两项旨在模拟艾滋病试验的模拟研究中得到了说明。

相似文献

1
Analyzing sequentially randomized trials based on causal effect models for realistic individualized treatment rules.基于因果效应模型分析序贯随机试验以制定现实的个体化治疗规则。
Stat Med. 2008 Aug 30;27(19):3689-716. doi: 10.1002/sim.3268.
2
Causal effect models for realistic individualized treatment and intention to treat rules.用于现实个体化治疗和意向性治疗规则的因果效应模型。
Int J Biostat. 2007;3(1):Article 3. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1022.
3
Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part I.基于靶向最大似然法的因果推断:第一部分。
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 2. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1211.
4
Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part II.基于靶向最大似然法的因果推断:第二部分。
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 3. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1241. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
5
Two-step estimation in ratio-of-mediator-probability weighted causal mediation analysis.两阶段估计在中介概率比加权因果中介分析中的应用。
Stat Med. 2018 Apr 15;37(8):1304-1324. doi: 10.1002/sim.7581. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
6
Statistical learning of origin-specific statically optimal individualized treatment rules.特定起源的静态最优个体化治疗规则的统计学习
Int J Biostat. 2007;3(1):Article 6. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1040.
7
Enhanced precision in the analysis of randomized trials with ordinal outcomes.对具有有序结局的随机试验进行分析时提高精度。
Biometrics. 2016 Jun;72(2):422-31. doi: 10.1111/biom.12450. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
8
Doubly Robust and Efficient Estimation of Marginal Structural Models for the Hazard Function.风险函数边际结构模型的双重稳健与有效估计
Int J Biostat. 2016 May 1;12(1):233-52. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0036.
9
Causal inference in epidemiological studies with strong confounding.具有强混杂的流行病学研究中的因果推断。
Stat Med. 2012 Jun 15;31(13):1380-404. doi: 10.1002/sim.4469. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
10
Efficiency and robustness of causal effect estimators when noncompliance is measured with error.当非依从性的测量存在误差时,因果效应估计的效率和稳健性。
Stat Med. 2018 Dec 10;37(28):4126-4141. doi: 10.1002/sim.7922. Epub 2018 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
A non-parametric Bayesian approach for adjusting partial compliance in sequential decision making.一种用于调整序贯决策中部分依从性的非参数贝叶斯方法。
Stat Med. 2023 Jul 10;42(15):2661-2691. doi: 10.1002/sim.9742. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
2
The Relationship of Pain Reduction With Prevention of Knee Replacement Under Dynamic Intervention Strategies.动态干预策略下减轻疼痛与预防膝关节置换的关系。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022 Oct;74(10):1668-1675. doi: 10.1002/art.42272. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
3
Design and analysis considerations for a sequentially randomized HIV prevention trial.
一项序贯随机化HIV预防试验的设计与分析考量
Stat Biosci. 2020 Dec;12(3):446-467. doi: 10.1007/s12561-020-09274-3. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
4
Fluid-limiting treatment strategies among sepsis patients in the ICU: a retrospective causal analysis.重症监护病房中脓毒症患者的液体限制治疗策略:一项回顾性因果分析
Crit Care. 2020 Feb 22;24(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2767-0.
5
Precision Medicine.精准医学
Annu Rev Stat Appl. 2019 Mar;6:263-286. doi: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-030718-105251.
6
Design and Analysis Considerations for Comparing Dynamic Treatment Regimens with Binary Outcomes from Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials.用于比较序贯多重分配随机试验中二元结局的动态治疗方案的设计与分析考量
J Appl Stat. 2018;45:1628-1651. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2017.1386773. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
7
Estimating the Comparative Effectiveness of Feeding Interventions in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Demonstration of Longitudinal Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation.评估儿科重症监护病房喂养干预措施的相对有效性:纵向靶向最大似然估计的实证研究
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 15;186(12):1370-1379. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx213.
8
Interactive Q-learning for Quantiles.用于分位数的交互式Q学习
J Am Stat Assoc. 2017;112(518):638-649. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1155993. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
9
Comparing dynamic treatment regimes using repeated-measures outcomes: modeling considerations in SMART studies.使用重复测量结果比较动态治疗方案:序贯多重分配随机试验(SMART)研究中的建模考量
Stat Med. 2016 May 10;35(10):1595-615. doi: 10.1002/sim.6819. Epub 2015 Dec 6.
10
Introduction to SMART designs for the development of adaptive interventions: with application to weight loss research.用于开发适应性干预措施的SMART设计简介:及其在减肥研究中的应用
Transl Behav Med. 2014 Sep;4(3):260-74. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0265-0.