Suppr超能文献

支持强度量表(SIS)的评分者间信度。

Interrater reliability of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS).

作者信息

Thompson James R, Tassé Marc J, McLaughlin Colleen A

机构信息

Special Education, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ment Retard. 2008 May;113(3):231-7. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[231:IROTSI]2.0.CO;2.

Abstract

The interrater reliability of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) was investigated under the condition that interviewers had to have been trained and/or experienced in its administration and scoring. Both corrected and noncorrected Pearson's product-moment coefficients were generated to assess interinterviewer, interrespondent, and mixed interrater reliability. The correlation coefficients for the SIS Support Needs Index Score and SIS subscale scores were considerably higher than coefficients reported in the SIS Users Manual that were derived from a similar study conducted with untrained, inexperienced interviewers.

摘要

在访谈者必须接受过该量表施测和评分培训及/或具备相关经验的条件下,对支持强度量表(SIS)的评分者间信度进行了研究。生成了校正和未校正的皮尔逊积差相关系数,以评估访谈者之间、受访者之间以及混合评分者间的信度。SIS支持需求指数得分和SIS分量表得分的相关系数显著高于SIS用户手册中报告的系数,后者来自一项针对未经培训、缺乏经验的访谈者进行的类似研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验