Thompson James R, Tassé Marc J, McLaughlin Colleen A
Special Education, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790, USA.
Am J Ment Retard. 2008 May;113(3):231-7. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[231:IROTSI]2.0.CO;2.
The interrater reliability of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) was investigated under the condition that interviewers had to have been trained and/or experienced in its administration and scoring. Both corrected and noncorrected Pearson's product-moment coefficients were generated to assess interinterviewer, interrespondent, and mixed interrater reliability. The correlation coefficients for the SIS Support Needs Index Score and SIS subscale scores were considerably higher than coefficients reported in the SIS Users Manual that were derived from a similar study conducted with untrained, inexperienced interviewers.
在访谈者必须接受过该量表施测和评分培训及/或具备相关经验的条件下,对支持强度量表(SIS)的评分者间信度进行了研究。生成了校正和未校正的皮尔逊积差相关系数,以评估访谈者之间、受访者之间以及混合评分者间的信度。SIS支持需求指数得分和SIS分量表得分的相关系数显著高于SIS用户手册中报告的系数,后者来自一项针对未经培训、缺乏经验的访谈者进行的类似研究。