Piccorelli Annalisa V, Moody Eric J, Heath David, Dahl Ethan, Root-Elledge Sandy
Division of Biostatistics, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Wyoming Institute for Disabilities, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 19;20(9):e0294539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294539. eCollection 2025.
The Inventory for Client and Agency Planning (ICAP) and the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) have been used to determine Medicaid eligibility for individuals with disabilities but are designed to capture different information. This project explored how these surveys relate to services received and each other. ICAP and SIS surveys were conducted on 125 Wyoming adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities eligible for a Medicaid Waiver. Results suggest that both measures were strongly associated and could be used to predict services. However, this study suggests that the SIS and ICAP summary measures were separate constructs. Therefore, both instruments can be used to determine Medicaid eligibility, but implementers should be aware of differences in the types of constructs being captured.
客户与机构规划量表(ICAP)和支持强度量表(SIS)已被用于确定残疾人士的医疗补助资格,但它们旨在收集不同的信息。本项目探讨了这些调查与所接受服务之间的关系以及它们彼此之间的关系。对125名符合医疗补助豁免条件的怀俄明州成年智力和发育障碍者进行了ICAP和SIS调查。结果表明,这两种测量方法密切相关,可用于预测服务情况。然而,本研究表明,SIS和ICAP的汇总测量是不同的结构。因此,这两种工具均可用于确定医疗补助资格,但实施者应了解所收集结构类型的差异。