Chapman Dale Wilson, Newton Michael, McGuigan Michael, Nosaka Kazunori
School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 May;40(5):926-33. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318168c82d.
This study investigated the effect of lengthening contraction velocity on exercise-induced muscle damage.
Sixteen men were placed into two groups performing either 30 (N = 8) or 210 (N = 8) maximal lengthening contractions of the elbow flexors on an isokinetic dynamometer. Dominant and nondominant arms were randomly assigned for a slow-velocity (S: 30 degrees.s(-1)) or a fast-velocity (F: 210 degrees.s(-1)) exercise separated by 14 d. Maximal voluntary strength of isometric contractions (iMVC) and isokinetic concentric contractions (cMVC), range of motion (ROM), upper-arm circumference, muscle soreness, and serum creatine kinase (CK) activity were measured before, immediately after, and 1-120 h after exercise. Changes in these measures over time were compared by a two-way repeated-measures ANOVA to examine the effect of velocity in the same number of contractions (S30 vs F30; S210 vs F210) or the effect of contraction number at the same velocity (S30 vs S210; F30 vs F210).
A significant (P < 0.05) interaction effect was evident only for iMVC between S30 and F30, but it was evident for iMVC, cMVC, ROM, and CK between S210 and F210. Changes in most of the measures were significantly (P < 0.05) smaller after 30 contractions (S30 and F30) than after 210 contractions (S210 and F210).
These results suggest that the effect of contraction velocity on the magnitude of muscle damage after 30 contractions is minor; however, when 210 lengthening contractions were performed, the effect of contraction velocity became conspicuous. It is concluded that fast-velocity lengthening contractions are likely to induce greater muscle damage than slow-velocity contractions; however, muscle fatigue seems to be a confounding factor for the velocity effect.
本研究调查了拉长收缩速度对运动诱导的肌肉损伤的影响。
16名男性被分为两组,在等速测力计上对肘屈肌进行30次(N = 8)或210次(N = 8)最大拉长收缩。优势臂和非优势臂被随机分配进行慢速(S:30度·秒⁻¹)或快速(F:210度·秒⁻¹)运动,两次运动间隔14天。在运动前、运动后即刻以及运动后1 - 120小时测量等长收缩最大随意力量(iMVC)、等速向心收缩最大随意力量(cMVC)、关节活动范围(ROM)、上臂围、肌肉酸痛和血清肌酸激酶(CK)活性。通过双向重复测量方差分析比较这些指标随时间的变化,以检验相同收缩次数下速度的影响(S30与F30;S210与F210)或相同速度下收缩次数的影响(S30与S210;F30与F210)。
仅在S30和F30之间,iMVC存在显著(P < 0.05)的交互作用效应,但在S210和F210之间,iMVC、cMVC、ROM和CK均存在显著交互作用效应。30次收缩(S30和F30)后,大多数指标的变化显著(P < 0.05)小于210次收缩(S210和F210)后。
这些结果表明,30次收缩后,收缩速度对肌肉损伤程度的影响较小;然而,当进行210次拉长收缩时,收缩速度的影响变得明显。得出的结论是,快速拉长收缩可能比慢速收缩更容易诱导更大的肌肉损伤;然而,肌肉疲劳似乎是速度效应的一个混杂因素。