Magnavita N
Istituto di Medicina del Lavoro, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma.
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2007 Jul-Sep;29(3 Suppl):670-1.
The Italian version of a short anxiety and depression questionnaire developed by Goldberg et al. (1988) was applied to 1918 health care workers during periodical medical surveillance at work. Internal consistency reliability coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) value was 0.82 for anxiety scale (A), and 0.78 for depression scale (D); both scales can be retained "good". The factor structure of the two scales was examined through use of the factor analysis technique. The anxiety scale showed an homogenous pattern: a significant percentage of the variance (41.5%) was explained by a single summative factor which included all the items. Varimax orthogonal rotation of the D-scale variables yielded two factors, both typical of depression: reduced activity (6 items, 28% of variance), and poor self-image (3 items, 22% of variance). The scales would be used by occupational health physicians in medical surveillance as indicators of stress levels.
由戈德堡等人(1988年)编制的一份简短焦虑与抑郁问卷的意大利语版本,在对1918名医护人员进行定期工作医疗监测期间使用。焦虑量表(A)的内部一致性信度系数(克朗巴哈系数)值为0.82,抑郁量表(D)为0.78;两个量表均可保留为“良好”。通过因子分析技术检验了两个量表的因子结构。焦虑量表呈现出同质模式:一个单一的汇总因子解释了显著比例的方差(41.5%),该因子包含了所有项目。对抑郁量表变量进行方差最大化正交旋转产生了两个因子,均为典型的抑郁因子:活动减少(6个项目,占方差的28%)和自我形象不佳(3个项目,占方差的22%)。职业健康医生在医疗监测中将使用这些量表作为压力水平的指标。