Suppr超能文献

非药物干预措施在延缓痴呆患者机构化照护方面的有效性:一项荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in delaying the institutionalization of patients with dementia: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Spijker Anouk, Vernooij-Dassen Myrra, Vasse Emmelyne, Adang Eddy, Wollersheim Hub, Grol Richard, Verhey Frans

机构信息

Centre for Quality of Care Research, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jun;56(6):1116-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01705.x. Epub 2008 Apr 11.

Abstract

Contemporary healthcare policies are designed to shape the conditions that can help delay the institutionalization of patients with dementia. This can be done by developing support programs that minimize healthcare risks for the patients with dementia and their informal caregivers. Many support programs have been developed, and some of them are effective, but there has been no systematic review with a meta-analysis of all types of nonpharmacological support programs with odds of institutionalization or time to institutionalization as an outcome measure. A systematic review with a meta-analysis was therefore conducted to estimate the overall effectiveness of nonpharmacological support programs for caregivers and patients with dementia that are intended to delay institutionalization. Thirteen support programs with a total of 9,043 patients were included in the meta-analyses. The estimated overall effectiveness suggests that these programs significantly decrease the odds of institutionalization (odds ratio (OR)=0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.43-0.99, P=.05) and significantly increase the time to institutionalization (standardized mean difference (SMD)=1.44, 95% CI=0.07-2.81, P=.04). A meta-analysis of the best-quality studies still showed a positive significant result for the odds of institutionalization (OR=0.60, 95% CI=0.43-0.85, P=.004), although the time to institutionalization was no longer significant (SMD=1.55, 95% CI=-0.35- 3.45, P=.11). The analysis of the intervention characteristics showed that actively involving caregivers in making choices about treatments distinguishes effective from ineffective support programs. Further investigation should be directed toward calculating the potential efficiency of these support programs by applying net-benefit or cost-effectiveness analysis.

摘要

当代医疗政策旨在塑造有助于延缓痴呆症患者住院治疗的条件。这可以通过制定支持计划来实现,这些计划能将痴呆症患者及其非正式护理人员面临的医疗风险降至最低。许多支持计划已经制定出来,其中一些是有效的,但尚未有对所有类型的非药物支持计划进行系统评价并以住院治疗几率或住院时间作为结果指标进行荟萃分析。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价并进行荟萃分析,以评估旨在延缓住院治疗的针对痴呆症护理人员和患者的非药物支持计划的总体效果。荟萃分析纳入了13个支持计划,共有9043名患者。估计的总体效果表明,这些计划显著降低了住院治疗的几率(优势比(OR)=0.66,95%置信区间(CI)=0.43 - 0.99,P = 0.05),并显著延长了住院时间(标准化均值差(SMD)=1.44,95% CI = 0.07 - 2.81,P = 0.04)。对质量最佳研究的荟萃分析仍然显示,尽管住院时间不再显著(SMD = 1.55,95% CI = -0.35 - 3.45,P = 0.11),但住院治疗几率仍有显著的积极结果(OR = 0.60,95% CI = 0.43 - 0.85,P = 0.004)。对干预特征的分析表明,让护理人员积极参与治疗选择决策可区分有效和无效的支持计划。应通过应用净效益或成本效益分析来进一步研究计算这些支持计划的潜在效率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验