Gilbar Roy, Gilbar Ora
School of Law, Netanya Academic College, 1 University Street, Netanya 42365, Israel.
Bioethics. 2009 Mar;23(3):183-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00650.x. Epub 2007 Apr 8.
The objectives of the study were (1) to assess similarities and differences between breast cancer patients and their husbands in terms of doctor-patient/spouse relationships and shared decision making; and (2) to investigate the association between breast cancer patients and husbands in terms of preference of type of doctor, doctor-patient relationship, and shared decision making regarding medical treatment.
Fifty-seven women with breast cancer, and their husbands, completed questionnaires measuring doctor-patient/spouse relationships (paternalism, autonomy), and decision making regarding medical treatment.
Patients believe they have a key role in the medical decision-making process (93%) and that the participation of their husbands, and their agreement with the decision, is important (84% and 89%, respectively). Both breast cancer patients and their husbands prefer a shared decision-making process to paternalistic or autonomy-based approaches.
In contrast to legal and bioethical approaches, which focus on the patient as the primary decision maker, this study reflects a practical recognition of the role of the breast cancer patient's husband in the decision-making process. It also reflects a relational rather than an individualistic perception of patient autonomy.
本研究的目的是:(1)评估乳腺癌患者及其丈夫在医患/配偶关系和共同决策方面的异同;(2)调查乳腺癌患者及其丈夫在医生类型偏好、医患关系以及医疗治疗共同决策方面的关联。
57名乳腺癌女性患者及其丈夫完成了测量医患/配偶关系(家长式作风、自主性)以及医疗治疗决策的问卷。
患者认为他们在医疗决策过程中起关键作用(93%),并且他们丈夫的参与以及丈夫对决策的认同很重要(分别为84%和89%)。乳腺癌患者及其丈夫都更倾向于共同决策过程,而非家长式作风或基于自主性的方法。
与将患者视为主要决策者的法律和生物伦理方法不同,本研究实际认可了乳腺癌患者丈夫在决策过程中的作用。它还反映了对患者自主性的一种关系性而非个人主义的认知。